🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.std.c
Article #5261

Free-standing vs. hosted implementations

#5261
From: J M Hicks
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 1988 09:43
14 lines
1057 bytes
Some items in this news group or comp.lang.c have
alluded to a distinction made in the draft
ANSI standard for C between "free-standing" and "hosted" implementations of C.

What does this mean?  Anyone who does is invited to send me mail or submit
another item of news --- whichever you think is better.
--
J. M. Hicks (a.k.a. Hilary),
Computing Services, Warwick University, Coventry, England. CV4 7AL
On JANET:       cudat@UK.AC.WARWICK.CU (in the U.K.)
From BITNET:    cudat@CU.WARWICK.AC.UK
From ARPAnet: try  cudat%cu.warwick.ac.uk@cunyvm.cuny.edu   (untested)
On Usenet:      ...!ihnp4!mcvax!ukc!warwick!cudat
                                It helps if you spell "cudat" in lower case.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <672@sol.warwick.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!warwick!cudat

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!warwick!cudat
From: cudat@warwick.ac.uk (J M Hicks)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Free-standing vs. hosted implementations
Message-ID: <672@sol.warwick.ac.uk>
Date: 5 Aug 88 09:43:51 GMT
Reply-To: cudat@warwick.ac.uk (J M Hicks)
Organization: Computing Services, Warwick University, UK
Lines: 14