Article View: comp.std.internat
Article #282Re: Unicode vs ISO DIS 10646 (was universality of Latin-1)
From: kyongsok kim
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1991 20:19
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1991 20:19
18 lines
994 bytes
994 bytes
(Erik Naggum) writes: :Unicode is subject to endianism. could anyone please explain what "endianism" is? :Unicode employs floating diacritics for scripts which do not separate :the diacritic and the character to which it applies. most people in favor of iso 10646 attack floating diacritics. how do floating diacritics and non-spacing characters (which i believe iso 10646 adopts) differ? from end-users' point of view, these two seem one and the same. am i missing something? :[Erik Naggum] <enag@ifi.uio.no> :Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway <erik@naggum.uu.no> k kim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10003@plains.NoDak.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!plains!kkimShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!plains!kkim From: kkim@plains.NoDak.edu (kyongsok kim) Newsgroups: comp.std.internat Subject: Re: Unicode vs ISO DIS 10646 (was universality of Latin-1) Message-ID: <10003@plains.NoDak.edu> Date: 26 Apr 91 20:19:21 GMT Organization: North Dakota State University Fargo, ND Lines: 18