Article View: comp.std.internat
Article #454Re: 8-bit news
From: Anders Andersson
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:37
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:37
49 lines
2851 bytes
2851 bytes
[note my Followup-To: comp.std.internat] In article <CKD.92Dec16130204@loiosh.eff.org>, ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) writes: > VA> You don't send 8 bits to a site which does not understand it. It > VA> simply makes no sense -- they don't have appopriate fonts on their > VA> terminals anyway. > > How do you know if arbitrary-site understands it or not? YOU CAN'T. And > remember, the terminals may be several years newer than the mailhost. Also, the terminals needn't be directly connected to the host, or even owned by the same organization as the host (thus the capabilities of the fancy terminal may have no relevance for, or its owner may have no influence on, the gateway host software). But everybody knows that... :-) > MTAs are not MUAs. ...which is of course a more concise way to put it. Thanks! I'm personally not too bound to 8 bits as the ultimate data unit size. Today's efforts of 'stomping out' 7-bit transmission channels for being obsolete in the presence of superior *8-bit* channels (even as it's probably a good idea) may seem amusing sometime in the future, when 8 bits have likewise been stomped out in favour of 16 bits, or whatever is the fashion. So, I prefer not to be too quick labelling every 7-bit application as 'buggy' today, especially when they weren't yesterday. What? Are there *still* 8-bit processor architectures out there in the suburbs? ;-) What we really need is to separate the application issues from the transport issues. The application writer (or the user) need not, and *should* not, care about how the lower layers of the communication medium are implemented. The user may have specific demands in terms of speed and functionality, but it shouldn't matter to me whether this article is transported via an 8-bit channel, a 7-bit channel, a deck of punched cards on a jet plane or whatever, if it just reaches its destination unmodified and within reasonable time. By allowing the lower layers to pick any communication channel they like, the best performance is achieved. Ask DHL... Haven't people studied the OSI network reference model? -- Anders Andersson, Dept. of Computer Systems, Uppsala University Paper Mail: Box 325, S-751 05 UPPSALA, Sweden Phone: +46 18 183170 EMail: andersa@DoCS.UU.SE
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1gpvqaINNpre@corax.udac.uu.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!corax.udac.uu.se!Riga.DoCS.UU.SE!andersaReferences:
<CKD.92Dec15185902@loiosh.eff.org> <1glu1sINNoth@rodan.UU.NET> <CKD.92Dec16130204@loiosh.eff.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!corax.udac.uu.se!Riga.DoCS.UU.SE!andersa From: andersa@Riga.DoCS.UU.SE (Anders Andersson) Newsgroups: comp.std.internat,news.admin.misc Subject: Re: 8-bit news Followup-To: comp.std.internat Date: 17 Dec 1992 13:37:14 GMT Organization: Uppsala University, Sweden Lines: 49 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1gpvqaINNpre@corax.udac.uu.se> References: <CKD.92Dec15185902@loiosh.eff.org> <1glu1sINNoth@rodan.UU.NET> <CKD.92Dec16130204@loiosh.eff.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: riga.docs.uu.se