Re: What time is it? [Was: Data compression standard]

Article View: comp.std.internat

Article #503

#503

From: K P Donnelly
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 12:24

9 lines
890 bytes

If I received a message with a time stamp of
          1991-06-25 15:51:27 +02:00
I would assume, if I didn't know better, that it had been sent at
17:51 Universal Time, since 15+2=17.  In fact, of course, it was sent at
          1991-06-25 13:51:27

Anyone agree with me that the sign convention for time-zones is unfortunate?

   Kevin Donnelly

Technical Details

Message-ID: <11329@castle.ed.ac.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!olivea!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!yfcw14

References:

<859@spam.ua.oz> <3761@sirius.ucs.adelaide.edu.au> <shores.677707660@fergvax>  <1991Jun25.001607.28886@redsox.bsw.com> <ENAG.91Jun25161013@gyda.ifi.uio.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!olivea!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!yfcw14
From: yfcw14@castle.ed.ac.uk (K P Donnelly)
Newsgroups: comp.std.internat
Subject: Re: What time is it? [Was: Data compression standard]
Message-ID: <11329@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Jun 91 12:24:35 GMT
References: <859@spam.ua.oz> <3761@sirius.ucs.adelaide.edu.au> <shores.677707660@fergvax>  <1991Jun25.001607.28886@redsox.bsw.com> <ENAG.91Jun25161013@gyda.ifi.uio.no>
Organization: Edinburgh University
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message