🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2428@enea.UUCP> sommar@enea.UUCP(Erland Sommarskog) writes:
>
><Note that this is cross-posted. Please submit follow-ups to 
> comp.std.internat only>
> 
>Some months ago I asked for a new character concept where
>the result of string comparisons should depend on the 
>selected langauges. I stated that the old ASCII concept 
>one character <=> one collation value must go away. 
 

I hope Erland and others are aware of the work done in the ANSI X3.11 and POSIX
organizations. The problem with string compare was extensively
discussed during the "final" phase of X3.J11 and especially in
the Internationalization "subcommittee".

The proposal (which, hopefully, will become a full standard) identifies
two specific new library functions intended to provide support for
collation which is not dependent on the physical encoding. Both
are dependent on some (user-selectable) external information on
the desired collation sequence.

The two functions are: strcoll(3,C) and strxfrm(3C). They differ
in that strcoll performs a compare of two items (as strcmp) according
to the desired collation order, while strxfrm transforms the string
according to the external information such that a subsequent strcmp
using the "native" collation can be performed.

Strcoll is useful in occasional compares, while strxfrm is intended
for repeated compares, as in a sort (the table-driven compares are
qite slow, compared to the native compare, so a pre-transformation
before the actual sorting is quite advantageous).

Strcoll is also supported in the X/OPEN specifications, as nl_strcmp
and nl_strncmp.

Recently, the /usr/group Internationalizarion committee has made some
proposals to POSIX P1003.2 (commands & utilities) in the area of
regular expressions which draw heavily on these facilities.

In all cases, the collation order allows the "user" (actually, this
is more of an administrator type of job) to specify a collation
order in which the ordering is independent of character values.
In addition, the user can specify

1.  that a string of characters sort as one (example: Spanish ch and
    (ll),

2.  that one character sorts as a string (example:  German duble s),

3.  that several characters can have the same collation order (example:
    accented e's sort with unaccented e),

4.  that, if two strings containing such "equivalent" characters
    collate equal, then the order between them depends on a "secondary"
    collation value.

5.  that characters can be designated as "don't care", i.e. are
    disregarded when comparing.

As can be seen, this does change the collation from character-oriented
to string-oriented.

And finally, there are several UNIX systems on the market (notably,
the X/OPEN ones, inluding HP's, and one from IBM) which does provide
this functionality.

If there is an interest, I am more than happy to post more elaborate
descriptions of these thinks to the net.
 ------
Greger Leijonhufvud
INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation
Santa Monica, CA. 90404

"The above views does not represent
 anything but mine own..."
 				Reverse the polarity of the neutron flow!