Article View: comp.std.internat
Article #960Re: InterLanguages (was Re: All numeric representation of dates)
From: Damian Cugley
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 1988 11:41
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 1988 11:41
49 lines
2747 bytes
2747 bytes
I said (rashly):
> Esperanto often expresses concepts concisely that require complicated
> English phrases - random example: `IMHO' translates to `lau^ mi'.
Peter da Silva: peter@ficc.uu.net
> And in English it translates to 'I think'.
It wasn't a good example - I'm only a beginning Esperentist and `lau^
mi' (or `lauh mi'? `laux mi'?) was the first phrase that came to mind.
It *does* have different *connotations* from `I think' (and probably
from `IMHO' too {:-( ), however. If I remember correctly,
`connotations' was the topic of discission. There *are* better
examples. (Honest! :-) ).
> And look, no diacriticals!
I've already said that the diacriticals are amongst Esperanto's worst
`features'. I **WISH** Z. had had the sense to live up to his claim
that Esperanto would be easily spoken and written (and typed) by
*everyone*. The `H^' sound (sounds like the `chi' in `TeX' ?:-) ) has all
but dissappeared but those silly accents will endure forever.
It's easy to say something u^ -> w, j^ -> j -> y, g^ -> dj, s^ -> sh, k
-> c -> ts, c^ -> tsh, h^ -> k but this violates La Fundamentoj and is
as much a waste of time (and risk of getting flamed) as suggesting C
change == -> = -> :=, && -> `and', || -> `or' etc. We either stick with
the current dumb notation or create another language altogether.
> How does Esperanto compare to other universal languages (loglan?)? That's
> a better comparison.
I only know a little about other `interlanguages' - from what I've read
in Esperanto publications, mostly - but Esperanto has the largest
following, for what it's worth. Various `improved' Esperanto-offshoots
have appeared and died and the original keeps on strong.
pdc
--
/-------------------\/-------------------------\/------------------------\
| Damian Cugley =@= || pdc@hplb.lb.hp.co.uk || ...!mcvax!ukc!hplb!pdc |
| HPLabs Bristol UK || pdc%otter@hplabs.HP.COM || ...!hplabs!otter!pdc |
\-------------------/\-------------------------/\------------------------/
(#disclaim <net/std.h> 'Esperanto - la lingvo por sennacia fajrado')
(Feel free to correct my spelling, I'm dictionaryless)
> "Have you hugged your wolf today?"
We used to have two German Shepards but we had to give them away. :-(
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3690002@otter.hple.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!otter!pdcReferences:
<1401@spp2.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!otter!pdc From: pdc@otter.hple.hp.com (Damian Cugley) Newsgroups: comp.std.internat Subject: Re: InterLanguages (was Re: All numeric representation of dates) Message-ID: <3690002@otter.hple.hp.com> Date: 8 Sep 88 11:41:03 GMT References: <1401@spp2.UUCP> Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK. Lines: 48