Re: Latin-2 character set

Article View: comp.std.internat

Article #979

#979

From: Bruce Sherwood
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1989 14:56

6 lines
708 bytes

Oops.  I meant to ask about the supposedly already-existing Latin-1 keystroke
sequences, not the Latin-2 keystroke sequences (tho I'd be happy to learn of
them, too).

Bruce Sherwood
bas@andrew.cmu.edu  or  bas@andrew.bitnet

Technical Details

Message-ID: <cXt7Spy00VQX09olYn@andrew.cmu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!bbn!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!bas+

References: <411ed2aa.b88e@apollo.COM>, <cXsnSHy00VQX48UFpO@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!bbn!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!bas+
From: bas+@andrew.cmu.edu (Bruce Sherwood)
Newsgroups: comp.std.internat
Subject: Re: Latin-2 character set
Message-ID: <cXt7Spy00VQX09olYn@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 30 Jan 89 14:56:53 GMT
References: <411ed2aa.b88e@apollo.COM>,
 <cXsnSHy00VQX48UFpO@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 6
In-Reply-To: <cXsnSHy00VQX48UFpO@andrew.cmu.edu>

Reply to Parent Message