Thread View: comp.std.internat
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Tim Greenwood
Tue, 03 Nov 1992 14:59
Re: Unicode Implementors Workshop #4 in Franfurt
Author: Tim Greenwood
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 14:59
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 14:59
29 lines
2163 bytes
2163 bytes
The claim that "All currently used character sets can be transferred to Unicode." is exuberance on behalf of the writer of the advert for the workshop. I am sure that there are some characters in some character sets that are not in Unicode - after all anyone can invent a character set. The Unicode Standard is much more circumspect in its claims of inclusion. I quote from page 3 of "The Unicode Standard Version 1.0, Volume 1" pub Addison Wesley ISBN 0-201-56788-1 "The Unicode standard includes the character content of all major International Standards approved and published before December 31, 1990, in particular, the ISO International Register of Character Sets, and the ISO 6937 and ISO 8859 families of standards, as well as ISO 8879(SGML). Characters from other standards have also been included, specifically, from bibliographic standards used in libraries (ANSI Z39.47-1985[Roman], and ANSI Z39.64-1990[East Asian]), and from inportant national standards (ISCII 1988[India], GB2312-1980[China], JIS X 0208-1990 and JIS X 0212-1990[JApan], and from CNS 11643-1986[Taiwan]). Also included are characters from certain draft standards (such as ISO DIS 6861.2, Glagolitic, Old Cyrillic and Romanian Cyrillic for bibliographic informatin interchange), and from various industry standards in common use (such as code pages from Adobe, Apple, IBM, Lotus, Microsoft, WordPerfect, Xerox and others)." The best way to learn about Unicode is to read the two voluime standard. It is one of the very few standards that is both enjoyable and broadly educational to read. Tim
Unicode character coverage (was Re: Unicode Implementors Workshop #4 ...)
Author: F Avery Bishop
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 17:12
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 17:12
90 lines
4244 bytes
4244 bytes
Joan Aliprand of the Research Libraries Group (RLG) sent me the
following regarding coverage of bibliographic characters:
----
From: "Joan Aliprand" <BR.JMA@RLG%Forsythe.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Additional info. re bibliographic standards & Unicode
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <19921101.003@erik.naggum.no> enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum) writes:
> I have studied the ISO Registry of Coded Character Sets to be Used with
> Escape Sequences (maintained by ECMA), and many bibliographic character
> sets include characters not found in Unicode.
Unicode does not claim to cover all extant bibliographic character sets,
only certain American and International standards and draft standards for
bibliographic use, namely:
ANSI Z39.47 (Extended Latin alphabet) (also known as ANSEL)
ANSI Z39.64 (East Asian Character Code)
ISO 5426 (Extension of the Latin alphabet)
ISO 5427 (Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet)
ISO 5428 (Greek alphabet)
ISO 6438 (African)
ISO DIS 6861.2 (Cyrillic ... for historic Slavonic and European
non-Slavonic languages)
ISO DIS 6862.2 (Mathematical)
[The full bibliographical citation for each of these will be found in the
References section of volume 1 of "The Unicode Standard," Version 1.0
(1991).]
National bibliographic character sets registered with ECMA may include
other characters (in the Unicode sense) that are not present in Unicode
(nor in ISO 10646). These should be proposed as additions. [Appendix D in
volume 1 of "The Unicode Standard" tells how to propose additions to
Unicode.]
Certain characters in the extended Latin standards cited above were
deliberately not included in Unicode. They fall into two categories:
glyphic variants, and split ligatures.
1. Glyphic Variants
The four "hooks below" that occur both in ANSEL and in ISO 5426 were
unified as two Unicode characters, U+0327 NON-SPACING CEDILLA and U+0328
NON-SPACING OGONEK. There is some evidence that only two characters are
needed, and that bibliographic standards encode graphic variants as
discrete characters.
The ANSEL-Unicode correspondence is:
Latin F0 (Cedilla), Latin F7 (Left hook/tail) = U+0327 NON-SPACING CEDILLA
Latin F1 (Right hook), Latin F8 (Right cedilla) = U+0328 NON-SPACING OGONEK
The ISO 5426 equivalents of the ANSEL characters are:
Latin 5/0 (Cedilla), Latin 5/2 (Hook to left); and,
Latin 5/3 (Hook to right or ogonek), Latin 5/1 (Rude).
2. Split Ligatures
The Unicode Technical Committee has deferred the issue of non-spacing marks
that extend over more than one character, and deliberately chose to exclude
the accent "halves" (a primitive solution). The ligature sign is used in
the transliteration of languages written in Cyrillic script; the double
tilde occurs in Tagalog.
The ANSEL characters that have no mapping in Unicode (except for user
space) are:
Latin EB (Ligature, first half)
Latin EC (Ligature, second half)
Latin FA (Double tilde, first half)
Latin FB (Double tilde, second half)
The comparable characters in ISO 5426 are:
Latin 5/13 (Left half of ligature sign and of double tilde)
Latin 5/14 (Right half of ligature sign)
Latin 5/15 (Right half of double tilde)
Disclaimer: The above is the personal opinion of Joan Aliprand, and should
not be construed as policy of The Research Libraries Group, Inc.
--
F. Avery Bishop, (206)-865-8916 | Standard deviant
Digital Equipment Corporation |
fab@zso.dec.com |
Bellevue, WA |
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads