Article View: comp.std.misc
Article #112Re: Common Lisp is a dpANS in Public Review
From: Technically Sweet
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 22:53
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 22:53
19 lines
1066 bytes
1066 bytes
johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us (John R. Levine) writes: >But so far >nobody has come up with a plausible way to make up for the lost revenue >that ANSI needs to stay in business. An advantage of the current system >is that standards are paid for by people who actually use them. A disadvantage of the current system is that 95% of the standards arrived at are technically garbage. Down with ANSI! X, FDDI, PEX, OSI, ... The last really good one was Ethernet, and they had that forced down their throats. -- Lance Norskog Data is not information is not knowledge is not wisdom.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<#7-nz!r.thinman@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!thinmanReferences:
<CHYDE.92Aug20142758@pecos.ads.com> <CHYDE.92Aug20173445@pecos.ads.com> <1992Aug21.163403.7918@iecc.cambridge.ma.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!thinman From: thinman@netcom.com (Technically Sweet) Subject: Re: Common Lisp is a dpANS in Public Review Message-ID: <#7-nz!r.thinman@netcom.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 92 22:53:12 GMT Organization: International Foundation for Internal Freedom References: <CHYDE.92Aug20142758@pecos.ads.com> <CHYDE.92Aug20173445@pecos.ads.com> <1992Aug21.163403.7918@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> Lines: 19