🚀 go-pugleaf

otts@tfsg.UUCP (Chuck Otts) writes:
>We here at TRW are awaiting, like most the world, some type of movement
>from one or both organizations (growth of SVR4, status of OSF/1, etc.)
>so a choice can be made (direction in the 90's).  Not sure if a
>membership list is useful but figured it couldn't hurt.

  If you are waiting, you've already done what at least one vendor
wants.  It's true that they're a member of OSF, but I suspect they
have colleagues who are part of UI.

  Be warned: the dichotomy is deliberate, and is strongly approved
of by marketers of proprietary software who are overreacting to the
spectre of someone else's operating system running on their precious
hardware (:-)).
  You can 
	1) pick and chose technology on its own merits, and know that
	   vendors will be forced to support it if really is worthwhile
	   (ie, the normal pre-war assumption)
	2) apply political/purchasing pressure on the two antagonists
	   to force them into bed together.

  This is not a discussion of standards: its a discussion about
market power.

--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | davecb@Nexus.YorkU.CA, ...!yunexus!davecb or
72 Abitibi Ave.,      | {toronto area...}lethe!dave 
Willowdale, Ontario,  | "And the next 8 man-months came up like
CANADA. 416-223-8968  |   thunder across the bay" --david kipling