digests

Article View: comp.std.misc

Article #233

#233

From: Kyle Jones
Date: Fri, 12 May 1989 19:47

9 lines
867 bytes

Is RFC 934 the accepted standard for the format of digests?  That first
two widely distributed digest encountered are not complaint with this
RFC.  This leads me to wonder whether there is some other standard,
written or otherwise.

I need this information to provide support for digest bursting in a mail
front-end.  The agent currently works with RFC 934 complaint digests but
fails on malformed digests where "^-" to "- -" char stuffing is not
done.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <532@talos.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mcnc!rti!talos!kjones

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mcnc!rti!talos!kjones
From: kjones@talos.UUCP (Kyle Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.std.misc
Subject: digests
Summary: Is RFC 934 the accepted standard?
Message-ID: <532@talos.UUCP>
Date: 12 May 89 19:47:28 GMT
Reply-To: kyle@odu.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Philip Morris Research Center, Richmond, VA
Lines: 9