🚀 go-pugleaf

*** comp.realtime has been removed from this follow-up because our news
system doesn't know that newsgroup.  That is unfortunate; comp.realtime
would have been more appropriate than the remaining cross-posted groups.

In article <2140@umbc3.UMBC.EDU> chimiakb@mmlai.uu.net. (Dr. William Chimiak) writes:

>Could it be that Japan hopes to develop adequate software and hardware
>for a domestic market they have targetted?

You mean like the U.S.A. has done?  Blocking better OS's from some
American vendors?

>Now that they have a standard that the US cares nothing about,

That is the U.S.A.'s problem.  Japan cares something about American
operating systems, including inferior ones.

>those machines (no matter how
>inferior or superior) are national standards for a selected market.

Just like the U.S.A. did.

>They have a hammerlock on the their market

TRON will be public domain, unlike any U.S. operating system that I am
aware of.  Any serious U.S. company that is not preparing their TRON
OS now is rather foolish.

>and they still support popular non-Japanese systems for foreign sales

Yes, and the U.S.A. should learn to support popular non-American systems.

>and have a clever
>impediment to foreign sales.  In addition, if TRON meets design goals,
>then they will storm foreign markets.

Again, any serious U.S. company that is not preparing their TRON OS now,
even for their home market, is rather foolish.

***  There are reasons to be critical of TRON (several of its aspects
anyway), but Dr. Chimiak's posting did not cite any valid ones.

--
Norman Diamond, Sony Computer Science Lab (diamond%csl.sony.jp@relay.cs.net)
 The above opinions are claimed by your machine's init process (pid 1), after
 being disowned and orphaned.  However, if you see this at Waterloo, Stanford,
 or Anterior, then their administrators must have approved of these opinions.