Article View: comp.std.misc
Article #90Re: chord keyboard faster than traditional keyboard?
From: Ian Feldman
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 21:52
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 21:52
45 lines
2520 bytes
2520 bytes
In article <2941@ndsuvax.UUCP> nukim@ndsuvax.UUCP (kyongsok kim) writes:
>
>i found one chord-kbd related article in applied ergonomics (uk)
>(1983, 14-1, pp. 55-59). it reviewed chord kbds and its reference
>section contains a few recent papers.
>
>the conclusion is that the main adantages of chord kbd are:
>
> 1. can be operated by one hand.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Actually a chord-keyboard that is intended to be operated by one
hand only ought to be called input-pad or -device.
I believe that there once was a lot of interest (primarily in the
military research circles) for single-hand-operable input devices
for (battle) field commanders and the like. A number of studies
dealt also with chord-input aspects of things like helicopter
sticks / controls.
>back to my original question: as far as ordinary text processing is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>concerned, it seems that I still cannot find any experimental data showing
>that a chord kbd is much faster than the a traditional (sequential) kbd.
But that's obvious, isn't it? Chord keyboards are not used much
(if at all) for *ordinary* word processing for much the same reasons
why the _supposedly_superior_ Dvorak keyboard layout hasn't superseded
the QWERTY one - the latter does the job just fine.
That is why chord keybords are being used only in such applications
where the built-in limitations of general-input/ standard-alphanumeric
-layout keyboards constitute a hindrance towards given goals.
As far as I know the modern chord-keyboard saw light at an IBM Research
facility, c:a 1958. I recall having once had a research paper from there,
that dealt with ambidextrous (as opposed to one-handed) chord keyboards
in a typewriter-like device. Unfortunately I no longer have the paper,
nor a clue as to what it findings were. Try IBM Armonk/ Yorktown
Heights Research Library for starters...
--
----
------ ianf@nada.kth.se/ @sekth.bitnet/ uunet!nada.kth.se!ianf
----
--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1729@draken.nada.kth.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth!draken!ianfReferences:
<2941@ndsuvax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth!draken!ianf From: ianf@nada.kth.se (Ian Feldman) Newsgroups: comp.std.misc Subject: Re: chord keyboard faster than traditional keyboard? Message-ID: <1729@draken.nada.kth.se> Date: 21 Sep 89 21:52:50 GMT References: <2941@ndsuvax.UUCP> Reply-To: ianf@nada.kth.se (Ian Feldman) Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 44