Article View: comp.std.misc
Article #94The MicroWriter
From: Ian Feldman
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1989 17:45
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1989 17:45
63 lines
3690 bytes
3690 bytes
In article <696@hrc63.uucp> paj@hrc63.uucp (Mr P Johnson "Baddow") writes:
>
>About five or six years ago there was a gizmo on the market called the
>"MicroWriter". It had a one line 22 segment led display and a well designed
>chord keyboard.... [ stuff deleted ]
The MicroWriter was (is?) a chord-keyboard device merely by accident;
it was designed to be an electronic note-book, to be held in one hand
and operated with the other. I have a vague recollection of there being
2 unidextrous versions of it - left and righthanded. Its weakest point
was probably too few keys that made it impossible to use full character
set including the interpunction marks, lower AND upper case in an uniform
manner. The 65 possible characters (there were 4 keys for each of the
main digits and 2 for the thumb; the latter, when pressed together gave
the extra code) possible with chord-pressing (as opposed to a sequence of
escape-code plus one or more [chord] characters) were just not enough
to generate all of the alpha characters (52 in English), the 10 digits,
interpunction (some 6 to 8 chars) and another 6 - 9 MicroWriter-control
codes for scrolloing the text back and forth across the one 16-character-
line display.
BTW: the "MicroWriter" for the BBC Micro used the same physical hardware
though stripped to the bare-bones with no the display nor any internal
character-decoding firmware; the software supplied with it made it
possible to change the meaning of individual chords/ sequences by
selective binding of incoming chord-codes to chosen ASCII codes
(via a RAM-resident table) thus extending its usefulness somewhat.
>The device was a commercial flop. It was intended for notes and stuff, but
>the keyboard need[ed] learning... [ stuff deleted ]
It may have been a commercial flop, it was also held in esteem by its
highly dedicated users. The company (owned by an individual by the name
of Cy Enfield) made plenty of money selling it for GBP 1700 apiece
to various travelling salesmen & the like at a time when the nearest
(and only!) portable writing apparatus was the Osborne 1 that weighted
20+ kg and required a power supply.
>Could the MicroWriter concept
>be about to come of age? Two things we need:
>
>On-line help for chords and sequences.
>
>A chord system that becomes useful after a couple of hours
>practice (no more).
Actually - that's where MicroWriter failed - by having tried to implement
a one-handed chord system using "visually mnemonic" key layout. It never
worked. They'd have been better off with a chord system that built on
the frequency of characters in the English language - so that the most
frequent letters like 'e', 't' and 'shrldu' would be generated by the
single digits (fingers) and so on... making the learnig curve less steep.
>Paul Johnson
>GEC-Marconi Research
>The company has put a radio inside my head: it controls everything I say!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I want one too!
--
----
------ ianf@nada.kth.se/ @sekth.bitnet/ uunet!nada.kth.se!ianf
----
--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1780@draken.nada.kth.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!draken!ianfReferences:
<2952@ndsuvax.UUCP> <696@hrc63.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!draken!ianf From: ianf@nada.kth.se (Ian Feldman) Newsgroups: comp.std.misc Subject: The MicroWriter Keywords: (was: chord keyboard faster than traditional keyboard?) Message-ID: <1780@draken.nada.kth.se> Date: 26 Sep 89 17:45:48 GMT References: <2952@ndsuvax.UUCP> <696@hrc63.uucp> Reply-To: ianf@nada.kth.se (Ian Feldman) Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 62