Re: tar vs. cpio

Article View: comp.std.unix

Article #1028

#1028

From: std-unix
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1987 20:16

12 lines
1020 bytes

From: jss@ulysses.uucp (Jerry Schwarz)

One problem with tar format is that it has a fixed 100 character
limit on the length of pathnames.   While this may not have
been a problem in practice, it would be short sighted to adopt
a standard with this limitation.  

[ The format in POSIX 10.1 has a way of handling longer file names. -mod ]

Jerry Schwarz

Volume-Number: Volume 11, Number 49

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8203@ut-sally.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!husc6!ut-sally!std-unix

References: <8188@ut-sally.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!husc6!ut-sally!std-unix
From: std-unix@ut-sally.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
Message-ID: <8203@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Jun-87 16:16:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.8203
Posted: Wed Jun  3 16:16:23 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jun-87 10:07:46 EDT
References: <8188@ut-sally.UUCP>
Sender: std-unix@ut-sally.UUCP
Reply-To: jss@ulysses.uucp (Jerry Schwarz)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 12
Approved: jsq@sally.utexas.edu (Moderator, John Quarterman)

Reply to Parent Message