Re: parseargs vs. getopt

Article View: comp.std.unix

Article #308

#308

From: Leslie Giles
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 1990 15:32

19 lines
1323 bytes

From:  lezz@codex.uucp (Leslie Giles)

darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:

>You might like my getarg function.  I designed it as a replacement for
>   ... You can
>also initialise the argument list more than once supporting things such
>as environment default command lines, arguments from files etc mixed
>with arguments from the command line.  I just posted it recently to
>alt.sources and I'm interested in getting some feedback on it.

It is also possible to restart getopt() by setting various variables.
I did this in some code to support defaults, as mentioned above.  If anybody
wants to know how to do this then you can mail me (I don't have the code in
front of me at the moment - it'd take time to find it) at...

codex!lezz

Volume-Number: Volume 20, Number 54

Technical Details

Message-ID: <742@longway.TIC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!longway!std-unix

References: <378@usenix.ORG> <728@longway.TIC.COM> <729@longway.TIC.COM> <733@longway.TIC.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!longway!std-unix
From: lezz@codex.uucp (Leslie Giles)
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: parseargs vs. getopt
Message-ID: <742@longway.TIC.COM>
Date: 27 Jun 90 15:32:10 GMT
References: <378@usenix.ORG> <728@longway.TIC.COM> <729@longway.TIC.COM> <733@longway.TIC.COM>
Sender: std-unix@longway.TIC.COM
Reply-To: std-unix@uunet.uu.net
Organization: Codex Corp., Canton MA
Lines: 19
Approved: jsq@longway.tic.com (Moderator, John S. Quarterman)

Reply to Parent Message