Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #334Re: Mandatory Access Controls in the commercial world
From: peter da silva
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 1990 00:14
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 1990 00:14
12 lines
940 bytes
940 bytes
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (peter da silva) Seems to me that a strict hierarchy is insufficient. What do you do if you have two sub-organisations for which you don't want to allow *either* to be able to give files to one another (say, two different marketing groups setting up separate sealed bids)? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.ferranti.com> Volume-Number: Volume 20, Number 83
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<768@longway.TIC.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!longway!std-unixReferences:
<753@longway.TIC.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!longway!std-unix From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (peter da silva) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: Mandatory Access Controls in the commercial world Message-ID: <768@longway.TIC.COM> Date: 2 Jul 90 00:14:19 GMT References: <753@longway.TIC.COM> Sender: std-unix@longway.TIC.COM Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 12 Approved: jsq@longway.tic.com (Moderator, John S. Quarterman)