Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #359Re: Mandatory Access Controls in the commercial world
From: Jim Kingdon
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 1990 05:28
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 1990 05:28
13 lines
960 bytes
960 bytes
From: kingdon@ai.mit.edu (Jim Kingdon)
Thanks for providing some technical details. But can't the level be
made a special case of the set of categories? That is, define
categories CLASSIFIED, SECRET, TOP_SECRET, etc, and give people either
{TOP_SECRET, SECRET, CLASSIFIED} or {SECRET, CLASSIFIED} or
{CLASSIFIED}. Unless I'm missing something, this provides the same
functionality and is simpler.
You might want to post a clarification (or summary of this and other
messages).
Volume-Number: Volume 20, Number 107
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<793@longway.TIC.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!longway!std-unixShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!longway!std-unix From: kingdon@ai.mit.edu (Jim Kingdon) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: Mandatory Access Controls in the commercial world Message-ID: <793@longway.TIC.COM> Date: 6 Jul 90 05:28:35 GMT Sender: std-unix@longway.TIC.COM Reply-To: std-unix@uunet.uu.net Lines: 13 Approved: jsq@longway.tic.com (Moderator, John S. Quarterman)