Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #449Re: Question about atexit()
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 1990 20:12
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 1990 20:12
14 lines
1116 bytes
1116 bytes
From: Doug Gwyn <gwyn@smoke.brl.mil> In article <442@usenix.ORG> sp@mysteron.osf.org (Simon Patience) writes: >It was pointed out to me that atexit() is not defined in 1003.1 >1988. IEEE Std 1003.1-1988 didn't explicitly specify atexit() for the ANSI C- compatible variant because several people on P1003 didn't like it. If in your procurement specifications you specify conformance to both ANSI X3.159-1989 and IEEE Std 1003.1, then the ANSI C conformance requirement suffices to guarantee the provision of atexit() facilities. Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 45
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<443@usenix.ORG>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!uunet!usenix!std-unixReferences:
<442@usenix.ORG>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!uunet!usenix!std-unix From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: Question about atexit() Message-ID: <443@usenix.ORG> Date: 20 Aug 90 20:12:03 GMT References: <442@usenix.ORG> Sender: std-unix@usenix.ORG Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 14 Approved: jsq@usenix.org (Moderator, John Quarterman) X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net