Re: Question about atexit()

Article View: comp.std.unix

Article #469

#469

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 1990 03:44

14 lines
1165 bytes

From:  Doug Gwyn <gwyn@smoke.brl.mil>

In article <466@usenix.ORG> karish@mindcrf.uucp (Chuck Karish) writes:
>>Doug Gwyn is right: specify the Standard C conformant option to POSIX
>>(or simply specify Standard C) and you'll get atexit(). 
>I disagree.  Certainly if the customer specifies that a full
>implementation of standard C be part of the package, it will be
>present, but POSIX.1 doesn't require this.

And indeed I did NOT say what Donn's paraphrase suggests.
I said that if you need atexit() you should specify conformance
to the C standard (as well as any POSIX conformance that you need).

Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 66

Technical Details

Message-ID: <468@usenix.ORG>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!usenix!std-unix

References: <442@usenix.ORG> <450@usenix.ORG> <466@usenix.ORG>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!usenix!std-unix
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: Question about atexit()
Message-ID: <468@usenix.ORG>
Date: 28 Aug 90 03:44:10 GMT
References: <442@usenix.ORG> <450@usenix.ORG> <466@usenix.ORG>
Sender: std-unix@usenix.ORG
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 14
Approved: jsq@usenix.org (Moderator, John Quarterman)
X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net

Reply to Parent Message