Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #576Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.4: Real-time Extensions
From: Ran Atkinson
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 1990 12:55
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 1990 12:55
24 lines
1649 bytes
1649 bytes
Submitted-by: rja7m@plaid.cs.Virginia.EDU (Ran Atkinson) In article <545@usenix.ORG> ske@pkmab.se (Kristoffer Eriksson) writes: >What prevents us from inventing a few additional filesystem operations >that ARE general enough? PLEASE. Let's don't go off inventing new things as part of a standards effort. The proper way to approach standardisation is to standardise the existing practice and avoid all new inventions that haven't been fully implemented and tested widely. Many of the problems with UNIX-derived OSs have come from folks who didn't do this and ended up with stuff that wasn't really compatible with the rest of the OS in function or approach. A lot of the problems I see coming out of the working groups in P1003 come from folks failing to standardise existing practice and instead going off and inventing a new idea in the committee that hasn't been implemented and lacks adequate actual experience with whether the idea really works and is a general solution to a real problem. Randall Atkinson randall@Virginia.EDU Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 140
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<552@usenix.ORG>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!usenix!jsqReferences:
<523@usenix.ORG> <539@usenix.ORG> <541@usenix.ORG> <545@usenix.ORG>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!usenix!jsq From: rja7m@plaid.cs.Virginia.EDU (Ran Atkinson) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.4: Real-time Extensions Message-ID: <552@usenix.ORG> Date: 27 Sep 90 12:55:49 GMT References: <523@usenix.ORG> <539@usenix.ORG> <541@usenix.ORG> <545@usenix.ORG> Sender: jsq@usenix.ORG Reply-To: randall@Virginia.EDU (Randall Atkinson) Organization: University of Virginia Lines: 24 Approved: jsq@usenix.org (Moderator, John Quarterman) X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net