Re: POSIX.1 requires shell???

Article View: comp.std.unix

Article #641

#641

From: Dave Decot
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 1990 08:59

14 lines
1016 bytes

Submitted-by: decot@hpisod2.cup.hp.com (Dave Decot)

> Does POSIX.1 require that a shell interface capability exist? I know that
> POSIX.2 is still being worked, but is it possible that dot 1 does not
> require dot 2, but rather simply allows that if a shell is available it
> will be according to dot 2?

POSIX.1 does not require any shell interface capability to exist.  If one
is provided, it does not have to conform to POSIX.2 (unless, of course,
the system claims to conform to POSIX.2).

Dave Decot

Volume-Number: Volume 22, Number 22

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14647@cs.utexas.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!jbc

References: <14613@cs.utexas.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!jbc
From: decot@hpisod2.cup.hp.com (Dave Decot)
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: POSIX.1 requires shell???
Message-ID: <14647@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 90 08:59:17 GMT
References: <14613@cs.utexas.edu>
Sender: jbc@cs.utexas.edu
Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino
Lines: 14
Approved: jbc@cs.utexas.edu (Guest Moderator, J.B.Chambers)
X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net

Reply to Parent Message