Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #678Re: qfork()
From: Paul Eggert
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 1990 21:22
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 1990 21:22
19 lines
1221 bytes
1221 bytes
Submitted-by: eggert@twinsun.uucp (Paul Eggert) jason@cnd.hp.com (Jason Zions) writes: The intent of the [Posix.1a draft 5] text, I believe, is that *doing* anything between qfork() and exec*() [or _exit()] results in undefined behavior. I hope this is not the intent. Current applications often do the following actions between forking and execing in a child process: Redirect file descriptors using open(), close(), dup2(). Call write() and _exit() if the exec*() fails. Change signal handling, uid/gid/pgid/session, working/root directory. Call user-defined functions that modify their local variables. Both fork() and vfork() permit these actions. Why should qfork() prohibit them? Volume-Number: Volume 22, Number 42
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16245@cs.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!jsqReferences:
<16066@cs.utexas.edu> <16213@cs.utexas.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!jsq From: eggert@twinsun.uucp (Paul Eggert) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: qfork() Message-ID: <16245@cs.utexas.edu> Date: 26 Dec 90 21:22:33 GMT References: <16066@cs.utexas.edu> <16213@cs.utexas.edu> Sender: jsq@cs.utexas.edu Organization: Twin Sun, Inc Lines: 19 Approved: jsq@cs.utexas.edu (Moderator, John S. Quarterman) X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net