Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #861Re: POSIX - Caving In Under Its Own Weight (Long
From: Chris Flatters
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 23:21
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 23:21
20 lines
1339 bytes
1339 bytes
Submitted-by: cflatter@NRAO.EDU (Chris Flatters) In article 1halvbINN9kd@ftp.UU.NET, stephe@usenix.org (Stephen R. Walli) writes: >.... One should assume that the standard is based on >existing practice for the most part. That existing practice is in a >particular programming language for API type standards. Those will be >the first people to come forward to develop the standard. (There has >to be a need to standardize.) Actually, producing a language independent specification plus language bindings is already an existing practice for API standards. Both the ISO/ANSI GKS and PHIGS standards have this form. The only aspect of the POSIX effort that cuts new ground is the use of LI specifications to approximate existing APIs. Chris Flatters cflatter@nrao.edu Volume-Number: Volume 29, Number 88
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1hasa4INNcj9@ftp.UU.NET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mailReferences:
<1halvbINN9kd@ftp.UU.NET> 1halvbINN9kd@ftp.UU.NET,Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mail From: cflatter@NRAO.EDU (Chris Flatters) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: POSIX - Caving In Under Its Own Weight (Long Date: 23 Dec 1992 15:21:40 -0800 Organization: NRAO Lines: 20 Sender: sef@ftp.UU.NET Approved: sef@ftp.uucp (Moderator, Sean Eric Fagan) Message-ID: <1hasa4INNcj9@ftp.UU.NET> References: <1halvbINN9kd@ftp.UU.NET> 1halvbINN9kd@ftp.UU.NET, Reply-To: cflatter@NRAO.EDU NNTP-Posting-Host: ftp.uu.net X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net