🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #959

Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of l

#959
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 02:35
20 lines
1416 bytes
Submitted-by: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)

In article <1js17fINNenp@ftp.UU.NET> davecb@nexus.yorku.ca (David Collier-Brown) writes:
>  I'd like to follow the implied RFC model a bit closer and define a
>protocol.  You know, like ``first you open the file, then read or write
>for a while, then close''.

Well, gee, once you look at it that way, the spooler interface ought to
be something like:
	cp print_me /dev/spool
where the /dev/spool filesystem takes care of assigning unique queue names,
etc. and for example
	ls /dev/spool/status | grep "^$MY_UID"
would show how your jobs are doing.
Of course that's a bit simplistic, but why should we even THINK about
introducing a new, different protocol for some set of open/read/write/close
actions when we already have a general one?  (Or should have.)


Volume-Number: Volume 30, Number 39
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1jsv9fINN2fe@ftp.UU.NET>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mail
References: <1993Jan21.100223.17722@onionsnatcorp.ox.ac.uk> <1jmq5oINNfna@ftp.UU.NET> <1js17fINNenp@ftp.UU.NET>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mail
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of l
Date: 23 Jan 1993 18:35:27 -0800
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Lab, APG MD.
Lines: 20
Sender: sef@ftp.UU.NET
Approved: sef@ftp.uucp (Moderator, Sean Eric Fagan)
Message-ID: <1jsv9fINN2fe@ftp.UU.NET>
References: <1993Jan21.100223.17722@onionsnatcorp.ox.ac.uk> <1jmq5oINNfna@ftp.UU.NET> <1js17fINNenp@ftp.UU.NET>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftp.uu.net
X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net