Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #959Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of l
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 02:35
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 02:35
20 lines
1416 bytes
1416 bytes
Submitted-by: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) In article <1js17fINNenp@ftp.UU.NET> davecb@nexus.yorku.ca (David Collier-Brown) writes: > I'd like to follow the implied RFC model a bit closer and define a >protocol. You know, like ``first you open the file, then read or write >for a while, then close''. Well, gee, once you look at it that way, the spooler interface ought to be something like: cp print_me /dev/spool where the /dev/spool filesystem takes care of assigning unique queue names, etc. and for example ls /dev/spool/status | grep "^$MY_UID" would show how your jobs are doing. Of course that's a bit simplistic, but why should we even THINK about introducing a new, different protocol for some set of open/read/write/close actions when we already have a general one? (Or should have.) Volume-Number: Volume 30, Number 39
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1jsv9fINN2fe@ftp.UU.NET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mailReferences:
<1993Jan21.100223.17722@onionsnatcorp.ox.ac.uk> <1jmq5oINNfna@ftp.UU.NET> <1js17fINNenp@ftp.UU.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mail From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of l Date: 23 Jan 1993 18:35:27 -0800 Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Lab, APG MD. Lines: 20 Sender: sef@ftp.UU.NET Approved: sef@ftp.uucp (Moderator, Sean Eric Fagan) Message-ID: <1jsv9fINN2fe@ftp.UU.NET> References: <1993Jan21.100223.17722@onionsnatcorp.ox.ac.uk> <1jmq5oINNfna@ftp.UU.NET> <1js17fINNenp@ftp.UU.NET> NNTP-Posting-Host: ftp.uu.net X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net