Thread View: comp.std.unix
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Stephen R. Walli
Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:27
Standards Update, IEEE Standards Board
Author: Stephen R. Walli
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:27
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:27
206 lines
10160 bytes
10160 bytes
Submitted-by: stephe@usenix.org (Stephen R. Walli) Mary Lynne Nielsen <m.nielsen@ieee.org> reports on the September, 1992 meeting in New York, NY: September's meeting was unusually busy for TCOS, with lots of new project authorization requests (PARs) due to mirving activities and, at last, approval of one of the key components of POSIX. Decisions in the area of JTC1 funding will also have an impact on TCOS work. [Ed. - TCOS is the technical committee within the IEEE responsible for developing the POSIX standards.] At Long Last.... The IEEE Standards Board Review Committee (RevCom) approved P1003.2 and P1003.2a as IEEE standards at this meeting. POSIX.2 covers the shell and utilities for a POSIX system, while 1003.2a covers the user portability extensions for the shell. This pile of over 1300 pages of material is now in the publication process and should be available in the spring of 1993. Congratulations to all involved! Note to any who actively work with this committee: as of the March 1993 meeting, only the new RevCom submittal forms will be accepted. Make sure you're using the form dated 9/92. NesCom Actions Everywhere The IEEE Standards Board New Standards Committee (NesCom) dealt with a whopping 14 Project Authorization Requests (PARs) from TCOS at this meeting. Twelve of these 14 came from the mirving, or splitting up, of three existing TCOS projects. Why did that have to happen? Well, mostly from a lot of resolutions either from various committees of ISO/IEC JTC1 (all of which basically translates to ``the international group working on TCOS projects'') or from TCOS itself. These resolutions say that it's better to have this work, have it all completed at the same time, and have it in bite-sized, somewhat digestible chunks, rather than receiving one huge document that takes a great deal of time to prepare. (For example, POSIX.2 was in ballot for three years). What that means is that the various PARs in TCOS will often have to split into at least two and usually four parts: a base standard that is language independent, its test methods, a related language binding (usually C at first), and its test methods. While there is some debate as to the merits of this method, this practice is now being put into force in TCOS. The first documents to be produced in this manner will be the 1224 series of standards (which is now the 1224, 1326, 1327, and 1328 standards). There is a strong indication that these standards will make the March 1993 RevCom meeting for approval, and the PARs for their mirving were approved at this meeting. Also approved was a PAR for the revision of IEEE Std 1003.3-1991, the base standard on how to describe test methods for POSIX. Due to the expansion of testing to all TCOS (not just POSIX) standards and the need for test methods for new types of documents like profiles, the committee felt that it was time to start work on a revision of this standard. In an attempt to control the bewildering expansion of `dot' projects, a new numbering system will be employed for the POSIX testing standards. They will be numbered 2003.x, in parallel with the base standard they are testing. This revision is therefore numbered P2003. Finally, P1003.19 was finally approved at this meeting, when NesCom at last received the reassurances they wanted that this work was not an infringement on the X3 work on the Fortran language itself. As such, the PAR for work on a Fortran 90 binding to POSIX.1 has at last gained clearance to go ahead. Is It TransCom. . . or Isn't It? TransCom, the IEEE Standards Board Transnational Committee, has voted to changed its name to IntCom, the IEEE Standards Board International Committee, an action that was also approved by the Board. It seems that the term ``transnational,'' while used in the IEEE bylaws to define the scope of the IEEE, is very confusing to the members of this committee and to the people they speak to about their work. (My understanding is that the term means ``without borders''.) They feel that the word ``international'' far better suits the activities they undertake, which is to coordinate IEEE standards activities with non-US standards organizations. In addition, Trans/IntCom continued to work on a guide for synchronizing work with ISO/IEC JTC1, a plan that recognizes the methods used by POSIX to move its standards forward in this arena. This guide should hopefully be approved in December. IT Funding As mentioned in earlier snitch reports, the Standards Board has been wrestling with an action from ANSI that proposes having the groups involved in JTC1 activities support the secretariats of JTC1 that ANSI maintains. The IEEE Standards Board, representing one of the major groups involved, created an ad hoc committee to explore resolutions to this issue. TCOS supplied information to this committee in the form of a resolution expressing their position, while the committee examined the financial and legal aspects of this question. They also examined if this funding conflicted with the expressed goals of the IEEE Standards Board Strategic Objectives. The committee submitted its final report at this Board meeting. In it, they felt that these funds could be collected without any negative impact on the legal aspects, financial aspects, or stated objectives of the IEEE Standards Board. The report recommended that IEEE staff work with the standards committees in designing and implementing procedures for the collection and administration of participation fees assessed to IEEE participants for these secretariats. The report also stated that each standards committee should decide on its own procedures for fund collection, but they should be encouraged very strongly to standardize on one or two methods for collecting fees. One note on this: TCOS discussed this situation at its October meeting in Utrecht, and the following methods for collecting funds were approved by the TCOS Standards Executive Committee (SEC): an increase in balloting fees; an increase in NAPS mailing costs; a reduction in meeting services (such as Friday lunches); and a fee imposition for meetings held independently of the regular TCOS meetings. It was felt that this system would distribute the burden of raising these funds equitably among those who attend meetings and those who do not but who participate in the process through mailings. Awards and Recognition Three TCOS members received awards from the IEEE Standards Board, called IEEE Standards Medallions, in recognition of their contributions to standards development. They are Donn Terry, the former chair of POSIX.1, Hal Jespersen, the chair of POSIX.2, and Roger Martin, the chair of the TCOS Steering Committee on Conformance Testing (SCCT) and the former chair of the POSIX.3 (Test Methods) working group. Congratulations to them all. NesCom Approvals New PARs P1003.19 Standard for Information Technology - POSIX Fortran 90 Language Interfaces - Part 1: Binding for System Application Program Interface (API) P2003 Standard for Information Technology - Test Methods for Measuring Conformance to POSIX Revised PARs P1224 Standard for Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Abstract Data Manipulation - Application Program Interface (API) [Language Independent] P1224.1 Standard for Information Technology - X.400 Based Electronic Messaging Application Program Interfaces (APIs) [Language Independent] P1224.2 Standard for Information Technology - Directory Services Application Program Interface (API) - Language Independent Specification P1326 Standard for Information Technology - Test Methods for Measuring Conformance to Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Abstract Data Manipulation - Application Program Interface (API) [Language Independent] P1326.1 Standard for Information Technology - Test Methods for Measuring Conformance to X.400 Based Electronic Messaging Application Program Interface (API) [Language Independent] P1326.2 Standard for Information Technology - Test Methods for Directory Services Application Program Interface (API) - Language Independent Specification P1327 Standard for Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Abstract Data Manipulation C Language Interfaces - Binding for Application Program Interface (API) P1327.1 Standard for Information Technology - X.400 Based Electronic Messaging C Language Interfaces-Binding for Application Program Interface (API) P1327.2 Standard for Information Technology - Directory Services Application Program Interface (API) - C Language Specification P1328 Standard for Information Technology - Test Methods for Measuring Conformance to Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Abstract Data Manipulation C Language Interfaces - Binding for Application Program Interface (API) P1328.1 Standard for Information Technology - Test Methods for Measuring Conformance to X.400 Based Electronic Messaging C Language Interfaces - Binding for Application Program Interface (API) P1328.2 Standard for Information Technology - Test Methods for Directory Services Application Program Interface (API) - C Language Specification RevCom Approvals P1003.2 Standard for Information Technology - Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) - Part 2: Shell and Utilities P1003.2a Standard for Information Technology - Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) - Part 2: Shell and Utilities, User Portability Extension Volume-Number: Volume 30, Number 14
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads