Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #139Re: Garbage Collection & ADTs
From: William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1989 18:53
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1989 18:53
16 lines
1253 bytes
1253 bytes
From wright@hsi.UUCP (Gary Wright): > I have seen a number of people claim that GC can not be used in a > real-time system and then conclude that GC is a bad thing that should > not be used. You're missing several important steps here having to do with performance degradation and the violation of the general principle that one should never do at run time that which can be done instead at compile time, design time, etc.; in general, the sooner a problem is handled (and similarly, the sooner an error is detected), the less costly it will be to handle it. Why pay and pay and pay at run time when an efficient self-managing solution (valid forevermore) can be used (and reused) instead? Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6579@hubcap.clemson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.eduReferences:
<599@hsi86.hsi.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 ) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: Re: Garbage Collection & ADTs Message-ID: <6579@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 25 Sep 89 18:53:17 GMT References: <599@hsi86.hsi.UUCP> Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu Lines: 16