Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #17Re: Abstraction vs. optimization?
From: Frank Adams
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1989 09:49
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1989 09:49
11 lines
1026 bytes
1026 bytes
In article <51097@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Bruce Weide <weide@cis.ohio-state.edu> writes: >If there is to be a "reusable components" cottage industry, probably >many components will only be available as specifications plus runnable >code in object form. I suspect that software components in object form will never be successful. There is too much need to diddle with things, too little which can be used as is. And inheritance with run-time binding is too often an inadequate method of diddling. Frank Adams adamsf@cs.rpi.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5479@rpi.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!rpi!gershwin.cs.rpi.edu!adamsfReferences:
<7037@cbmvax.UUCP> <5667@hubcap.clemson.edu> <51097@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!rpi!gershwin.cs.rpi.edu!adamsf From: adamsf@cs.rpi.edu (Frank Adams) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: Re: Abstraction vs. optimization? Message-ID: <5479@rpi.edu> Date: 14 Jun 89 09:49:05 GMT References: <7037@cbmvax.UUCP> <5667@hubcap.clemson.edu> <51097@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Sender: usenet@rpi.edu Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY Lines: 11