Re: Lisps

Article View: comp.sw.components

Article #177

Back to comp.sw.components Previous Next

#177

From: William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1989 00:48

13 lines
963 bytes

From ted@nmsu.edu (Ted Dunning):
> trivial and lucid in lisps that support continuations and/or engines.
> try scheme, allegro common lisp, symbolics common lisp, or xerox's
> interlisp offerings.  

    I take it the Lisp community does not value portability...
    what happens when you want to take code from one manufacturer's
    Lisp and compile it on a different system?

    Also: how about exception handling?


    Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6617@hubcap.clemson.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu

References: <TED.89Sep27133034@aigyptos.nmsu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu
From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 )
Newsgroups: comp.sw.components
Subject: Re: Lisps
Message-ID: <6617@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Date: 28 Sep 89 00:48:48 GMT
References: <TED.89Sep27133034@aigyptos.nmsu.edu>
Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu
Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message