Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #237Re: Schedule and budget are secondary
From: William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1989 01:30
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1989 01:30
19 lines
1321 bytes
1321 bytes
From phil@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Phil Meyer):
>> A professional will meet cost and schedule
>> constraints by using CASE tools, advanced programming languages,
>> and so on, using overtime as the last resort.
>
> [...] I'm certain that most participants dream of the day when
> they can work 'regular' hours.
First, the context: my work experience so far has been with a
company which had to actually pay time-and-a-half for overtime,
which is usually a VERY expensive way to trade cost for schedule.
Also, Phil misinterprets my position. The idea is to maximize the
use of productivity tools FIRST; simply throwing time at the problem
makes little sense UNLESS we have already done all the things that
can be done to minimize the difficulty of solving it.
Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6748@hubcap.clemson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.eduReferences:
<9670@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 ) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: Re: Schedule and budget are secondary Message-ID: <6748@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 12 Oct 89 01:30:55 GMT References: <9670@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu Lines: 19