Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #243Re: Software quality
From: mjl
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1989 21:59
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1989 21:59
19 lines
1389 bytes
1389 bytes
In article <6756@hubcap.clemson.edu> billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu writes:
>From article <16193@vail.ICO.ISC.COM>, by rcd@ico.ISC.COM (Dick Dunn):
>> And what's this about advanced programming languages? Wolfe has, in other
>> postings, been an outspoken advocate of Ada, which is certainly *not*
>> advanced.
>
> Oh, then let's talk about how "advanced" C is, over in comp.lang.misc.
I'm into lingua-snobbery as much as anyone else, but is this really
the forum for it? And using it to willyhorton someone else's position
certainly does nothing to give added credibilty to your own. So
let's drop this and get back to the interesting quality issues that
started this thread.
Mike Lutz
Mike Lutz Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY
UUCP: {rutgers,cornell}!rochester!ritcv!mjl
CSNET: mjl%rit@relay.cs.net
INTERNET: mjl@cs.rit.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1345@cs.rit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!gatech!udel!rochester!rit!mjlReferences:
<16193@vail.ICO.ISC.COM> <6756@hubcap.clemson.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!gatech!udel!rochester!rit!mjl From: mjl@cs.rit.edu Newsgroups: comp.sw.components,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Software quality Message-ID: <1345@cs.rit.edu> Date: 12 Oct 89 21:59:42 GMT References: <16193@vail.ICO.ISC.COM> <6756@hubcap.clemson.edu> Sender: news@cs.rit.edu Reply-To: mjl@prague.UUCP (Michael Lutz) Followup-To: comp.sw.components Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY Lines: 19