Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #447using components
From: Michael Zehr
Date: Sat, 13 May 1989 19:31
Date: Sat, 13 May 1989 19:31
20 lines
1369 bytes
1369 bytes
There have been a couple of good comments about using software components, but so far most of them have been along the lines of "such-and-such a language does this." Could you describe *how* the language provides both efficiency and quick building time? For example, one person mentioned Ada's "re-binding" of executables. What does this do? Someone also mentioned being able to reuse components in different languages. I agree that this is crucial in combining efficiency with productivity. So far, my experience with mixed-language coding is that it is very easy on Vaxes (becuase of the forced procedure interface of the CALLS instruction) but extremely difficult on IBM mainframes (because there is no standard calling sequence). Does anyone have any experience in mixed-language coding on newer RISC machines? Do compiler witers stick to "standardized" calling mechanisms? -michael j zehr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11401@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!athena.mit.edu!tadaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!athena.mit.edu!tada From: tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael Zehr) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: using components Message-ID: <11401@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> Date: 13 May 89 19:31:29 GMT Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Reply-To: tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael Zehr) Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 20