Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #49Re: Inheritance vs. component effic
From: William Thomas Wolfe,2847,
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1989 14:41
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1989 14:41
29 lines
2141 bytes
2141 bytes
From article <130200009@p.cs.uiuc.edu>, by johnson@p.cs.uiuc.edu:
> Many, if not most, languages do not allow pointers to functions to
> be stored in structures. In particular, Ada does not.
This is one of the proposed Ada 9X revisions, and I think there
is a fairly high probability that it will get through. However,
it is important to note that the 'ADDRESS attribute provides almost
the same thing (ANSI/MIL-STD-1815A, Appendix A, paragraph 2):
P'ADDRESS For a prefix P that denotes an object, a program unit,
a label, or an entry: Yields the address of the first
of the storage units allocated to P. For a subprogram,
package, task unit, or label, this value refers to the
machine code associated with the corresponding body or
statement. For an entry for which an address clause has
been given, the value refers to the corresponding hardware
interrupt. The value of this attribute is of the type
ADDRESS defined in the package SYSTEM. (See 13.7.2.)
A value of type ADDRESS can then be converted to an arbitrary pointer
type through the use of UNCHECKED_CONVERSION. The major restriction,
then, is not an inability to store a pointer to a function in a record
type; rather, it is the fact that there is not a mechanism which can
express the desire to invoke the function residing at that address;
the 9X proposed revision would therefore provide such a mechanism.
Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6333@hubcap.clemson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.eduReferences:
<130200009@p.cs.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe,2847,) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: Re: Inheritance vs. component effic Message-ID: <6333@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 25 Aug 89 14:41:01 GMT References: <130200009@p.cs.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu Lines: 29