Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #75Re: Reasons for low reuse
From: William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1989 19:21
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1989 19:21
18 lines
1476 bytes
1476 bytes
From article <13499@well.UUCP>, by nagle@well.UUCP (John Nagle):
> Having used a few of these products, my main observation is that
> using software components from multiple vendors tends to result in
> annoying problems. A typical problem stems from several components
> assuming that they can safely replace some standard portion of the
> standard C library (such as "printf" or "exit") with their own version.
> This is a good reason for only buying components for which one gets
> source code, so that such problems can be resolved.
Alternatively, you can use a language whose designers recognized
the need for portability; Ada prohibits subsets and supersets, and
issues validation certificates to compilers only after they have
passed a rigorous validation suite; even then, the certificate is
only good for about 18 months, at which point the compiler must face
a newer, stronger validation suite if it is to obtain a new certificate.
Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6425@hubcap.clemson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.eduReferences:
<13499@well.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!gatech!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 ) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: Re: Reasons for low reuse Message-ID: <6425@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 9 Sep 89 19:21:33 GMT References: <13499@well.UUCP> Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu Lines: 18