Article View: comp.sw.components
Article #87Re: Reasons for low reuse
From: Scott Henninger
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1989 17:09
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1989 17:09
16 lines
942 bytes
942 bytes
|>From: hopper@ntmtv.UUCP (Ian Hopper) | |I have always felt that some form of Garbage Collection is |needed in order to do a decent job on reusable "Collection" |modules. Since the current favorite language (C++) does |not consistiently (or easily) support GC, we do not see |good quality collection modules. Quality in what sense? Program efficiency? Cognitive efficiency (i.e. how readable it is)? Correctness? Reliability? -- Scott scotth@boulder.colorado.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11701@boulder.Colorado.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!scotthReferences:
<175@ntmtv.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!scotth From: scotth@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Scott Henninger) Newsgroups: comp.sw.components Subject: Re: Reasons for low reuse Message-ID: <11701@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 15 Sep 89 17:09:45 GMT References: <175@ntmtv.UUCP> Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU Reply-To: scotth@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Scott Henninger) Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder Lines: 16