🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.acorn.apps
Article #90

Re: Zip vs Syquest. Which?

#90
From: Patrick Herborn
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 1997 00:00
46 lines
2692 bytes
In article <ant0419570b0WWT7@year0332.innet.be>
          Manuel Timmers <starcorp@innet.be> wrote:

> The par. version is logically a tad slower

Nothing 'logical' about that! The data transfer rate off the medium is the
limiting factor for the SCSI version. Now, parallel ports can go up to 2MB/s
using ECP protocol, but the medium is only capable of 1.4MB/sec. So if the
VP10 parallel port interface chip was better, then the parallel port version
would be just as fast.

> Iomega is a dumbass company whom doen't respond to email, faxes nor
> telephones... it's 0900 call nos. are usually unmanned and if you
> happen to find someone picking up the phone they have absolutly no
> fucking idea what you're talking about... especially when you tell
> them that you're NOT running windows :-(

You've been talking to the wrong people at Iomega, then. If you go straight
to the "horse's mouth" you'll get much better support. There's a big
difference between "customer support" and "tech support" :-) I could give you
the email address of their Zip guru, but I'de probably get shot, so I'de
better not!

> A typical American company....

A typical customer support hotline, IMHO.

> I guess that Syquest isn't any better.


Hmmm.... you've just been looking in the wrong places.
 
> Manuel

Cheers,

Pat.

-- 
�=============================================================================�
| Patrick Herborn,      |  pat@nanobyte.demon.co.uk  |  Primary Mail Address  |
| Electronic Engineer.  |  pherborn@libris.co.uk     |  Alternative  Address  |
'============================================================================='
Immensely inspiring tagline follows....
.. 66MHz ain't fast enough!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9895e04747@nanobyte.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <na.94a9914742.a701a0jsd@argonet.co.uk> <na.4bf72d4742.a70190steve.pampling@argonet.co.uk> <na.9397d54743.a701a0jsd@argonet.co.uk> <na.eca4104743.a40080mdavies@argonet.co.uk> <na.6bbb294743.a70320pyoung@argonet.co.uk> <e3cdb24447@ursaminr.demon.co.uk> <ant3119110b0yYVB@darwin.u-net.com> <ant0301280b06vXP@nelson.tcp.co.uk> <ant0419570b0WWT7@year0332.innet.be>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 113320,b059f700ad088f05
X-Google-Attributes: gid113320,public
X-Google-Thread: fa3dd,b059f700ad088f05
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa3dd,public
From: Patrick Herborn <pat@nanobyte.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Zip vs Syquest. Which?
Date: 1997/01/05
Message-ID: <9895e04747@nanobyte.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 207922031
x-nntp-posting-host: nanobyte.demon.co.uk
references: <na.94a9914742.a701a0jsd@argonet.co.uk> <na.4bf72d4742.a70190steve.pampling@argonet.co.uk> <na.9397d54743.a701a0jsd@argonet.co.uk> <na.eca4104743.a40080mdavies@argonet.co.uk> <na.6bbb294743.a70320pyoung@argonet.co.uk> <e3cdb24447@ursaminr.demon.co.uk> <ant3119110b0yYVB@darwin.u-net.com> <ant0301280b06vXP@nelson.tcp.co.uk> <ant0419570b0WWT7@year0332.innet.be>
x-posting-agent: RISC OS Newsbase 0.56
x-nntp-poster: FreeNews 1.03
organization: Nanobyte Systems
newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.apps,argonet.acorn.assist