🚀 go-pugleaf

What's MI5...is that some kind of highway bypass in London or Wellington or 
something???

<MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07072512164008@4ax.com...
>
> Neil Fox's Juke Box on Capital Radio (week ending 15/March/1998)
>
> Certainty level: 70%
>
> Here is an excerpt from Neil Fox's show on Capital Radio 95.8FM, sometime
> during the week ending Sunday 15/March/1998 (probably during the weekend,
> but I don't remember).
>
> First I will give the text of the conversation between Neil Fox and
> telephone caller Martin, then I will state my interpretation.
>
> (conversation) (F=Dr Fox, M=Martin the caller)
>
> F: coming up on the jukebox, the hotline's 0171-4848-958, just a quick 
> shout
> here and so who's this going to be then Mr Producer?
> (staff, shouting) MARTIN!
> F: Couldn't quite hear you, it's going to be?
> (staff, normal voice) Martin.
> F: Thank you. Martin, hello.
> M: Hello, Foxy.
> F: How are you Martin.
> M: Er, knackered.
> F: Why?
> M: Didn't get much sleep last night. Party down the road.
> F: What time did you go to bed?
> M: Four o'clock this morning.
> F: Well that sounds quite a reasonable Saturday night if you ask me.
> M: I was up at eight.
> F: You were up at eight this morning?
> M: Yeah.
> F: That's sick. Why? What on earth made you get out of bed at eight this
> morning?
> M: My father.
> F: Well that's no good. Why is he being sicko, is he being a sadist?
> M: No, he out there, sort of clearing room.
> F: Listen, is your dad there?
> M: No, he's downstairs.
> F: Oh mate, can you get him?
> M: No.
> F: Does he not let you on the phone? The only reason is that I wouldn't 
> mind
> having a chat with someone who makes anyone get up at eight o'clock on a
> Sunday morning. I'm sorry, that's ill isn't it, that's out of order.
> M: It's sick.
> F: I'm just going to ask around here. What do you think then, eight 
> o'clock
> Sunday morning? That's out of order isn't it, for any father?
> (staff) Yeah, definitely.
> F: Is he like victimising you or something, is there any reason why he 
> wanted
> you up at eight o'clock? To clean your room?
> M: Well as I say I got up at eight this morning to clean my room and it 
> looks
> worse that it did yesterday.
> F: Well I should have just left it and stayed in there until eleven 
> o'clock
> if I was you.
> M: Well I was up, I didn't get out of bed.
> F: What, you didn't get out of bed at eight o'clock? No, he woke you up at
> eight o'clock. Did you do any cleaning at all?
> M: I haven't touched my bedroom.
> F: Top man. Boy you're going to get your arse kicked later aren't you. Now
> a song for you, what can we play?
> M: Guns and Roses, "Sweet Child of Mine".
> F: And we're going to dedicate this to your father?
> M: No we're not, we'll dedicate this to my good mate Jamie, who's sitting
> on the bed now.
> F: Right, hello Jamie. And anyone else? Any top totty in your life at the
> moment?
> M: Unfortunately no.
> F: The totty factor is quite low at the moment is it?
> M: It's dead.
> F: It's dead? What, nothing?
> M: Nothing.
> F: What, zero? Well, that's pathetic. No wonder you're down. You stay out
> til four o'clock and nothing. We'd better have words when we're off the
> radio I think. We need to give you a team talk. You have a good night 
> tonight.
> M: And you.
> F: Take care.
> (song starts)
> F: Actually something was going through my mind. I think I'll leave it.
>
> I'm not really sure whether this is in any way about me. It probably 
> isn't.
> Probably it's just my nasty suspicious mind finding links where none 
> exist.
> However, here is an explanation of why it might, possibly, be about me.
>
> Throughout this interview, I was throwing abuse at the radio, and to my 
> mind,
> Neil Fox was hearing the abuse, and responding interactively. This 
> explains
> why he sounds so stressed when talking to telephone caller Martin, and the
> general violence of his words including "Boy you're going to get your arse
> kicked later aren't you".
>
> The piece starts of with the producer shouting the name of the caller, 
> which
> might be related to my loud vocalisations at the radio. The trouble starts
> off with Fox saying "That's sick". "Sick" might be taken as a reference to 
> my
> condition. Then Fox says, "Why is he being sicko, is he being a sadist?",
> again sick = my illness, "sadist" = attitude of my oppressors towards me.
> "that's ill isn't it" = further comment on my illness. "Is he like
> victimising you or something" = again what my enemies are doing to me.
>
> Fox sounds quite happy when he gets Martin to say "It's sick"; as you 
> would
> expect him to, if the comment were directed at me. It is a constant 
> feature
> of my enemies' harassment of me that they get intermediaries to verbalise 
> the
> abuse. Immediately after saying "victimising you" Fox gives a little 
> laugh,
> to show he thinks the victimisation (of me, not Martin) is funny.
>
> Fox gets increasingly nasty as the piece progresses. "Boy you're going to 
> get
> your arse kicked later aren't you" is not really what you would expect him 
> to
> say if he were just talking to Martin. Fox is on the same side as Martin, 
> so
> why would he be so verbally aggressive to him? On the other hand, if the
> piece is about me, then his strong words start to make sense.
>
> Fox's jubilation at finding that Martin's "totty factor" is "dead" again
> doesn't make much sense unless you think that he might not be considering
> Martin's totty factor, but mine, since it's a fairly well known fact that 
> my
> "totty factor" is not significantly above zero.
>
> To round off the 135 second interchange, just as the next track is 
> starting,
> Fox says, "Actually something was going through my mind. I think I'll 
> leave
> it". Given that I was chucking abuse at Fox throughout, it is only natural
> for him have thought up a reply that he would have wished to have made,
> except that such a reply would (a) probably not be suitable for a family
> show, and (b) have given the game away completely.
>
> So there you are. You the jury, what say you in the case of plaintiff vs.
> Neil Fox's Juke Box, guilty or not guilty?
>
> 5537
>
>
> --
> Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
>      ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
> Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access