🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.acorn.misc
Article #295

To billion or not to billion (was: arm worth billion)

#295
From: Reg Hems
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 00:00
50 lines
2636 bytes
In article <bb59ddf48%dickon-news@splurge.fluff.org> Dickon Hood
       <dickon-news@fluff.org> wrote:
> In message <ant051224868ew4o@gromit.tquest.org.uk> Barry Wickett
      <Barry@tquest.org.uk> wrote:

>> Nobody uses the old UK version of billion anymore except the 
>> pedants in this newsgroup.
I never remember which is which but assume the 'old' UK version 
(prior to about 1960) was 10^9? It still is in USA, Italy.

> And elsewhere.

Ok, to be precise rather than pedantic. I checked with a few
'old' dictionaries. Dates in brackets below.

Prior to the introduction of the SI (Syst�me International), a 
number of countries used the (N-1) rule in their systems of
numeration, others used the (N) rule.

(N) rule is used in Germany, UK, France and other countries:

Billion: 10^12
In the UK system (1960) - German (1940) - Dutch (1942) - 
French from 3 May 1961.
                   
(N-1) rule, or the Latin rule, used still in USA, Italy and other
countries.

Billion: 10^9  
In the French system (1939) till 3 May 1961 - Italian (1960) -
American system. However, the Dutch\English dictionary (1940)
gives English billion as 10^12.

Enc.Brit. 1977.
.... US congress passed legislation in ... 1968 that the USA change 
to the SI System of Units over a period of 10 years, at the end of
which the nation will be predominantly metric. 
          ^^^^^^
I.e. America is going metric, inch by inch  ;^)
�
* An off-topic a day, makes the netcops go 'Hey!'

-- 
Reg Hems ZFC LXV2 \_
BBC B Micro Issue 3 \_
420/1-IDE-RO3.11-4 Mb \_
Atomwide Serial 2-Ports \_
USR Sportster 28.8-57600b \_
      reghems@argonet.co.uk |
Uploaded to news.dial.pipex.com on Tue,09 Mar 1999.01:00:16
Technical Details
Message-ID: <48dfcfaec1reghems@argonet.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <na.4f04a048dd.a70290wykes@argonet.co.uk> <48DD25B65D%news@youmustbejoking.demon.com.uk> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903041729510.42332-100000@BITS.bris.ac.uk> <920580116.219628@BITS.bris.ac.uk> <ant051224868ew4o@gromit.tquest.org.uk> <bb59ddf48%dickon-news@splurge.fluff.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: fdce9,6308c4c2e65df04d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdce9,public
X-Google-Thread: f73c4,8c8b8a4204a8d30
X-Google-Attributes: gidf73c4,public
From: Reg Hems <reghems@argonet.co.uk>
Subject: To billion or not to billion (was: arm worth billion)
Date: 1999/03/08
Message-ID: <48dfcfaec1reghems@argonet.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 452786868
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <na.4f04a048dd.a70290wykes@argonet.co.uk> <48DD25B65D%news@youmustbejoking.demon.com.uk>  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903041729510.42332-100000@BITS.bris.ac.uk> <920580116.219628@BITS.bris.ac.uk> <ant051224868ew4o@gromit.tquest.org.uk> <bb59ddf48%dickon-news@splurge.fluff.org>
Followup-To: argonet.zfc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: Wazzat
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Pluto/1.11d  (RISC-OS/3.1)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.misc,argonet.zfc