Article View: comp.sys.acorn.tech
Article #407Decay of Optical vs Magnetic (re: Rem mass storage)
From: mcg
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:37
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:37
34 lines
1785 bytes
1785 bytes
In article <5593@krafla.rhi.hi.is>, adamd@rhi.hi.is (Adam David) writes:
> ee91mds2@brunel.ac.uk (Mark D Smith) writes:
[cut]
> The data on optical disks decays slower than on
> magnetic disks, so is good for relatively long-term storage.
>
Umm, this last statement is dependent on how long you leave a magnetic disc
beside a montior or in the sun. If you do neither, and store the disc out of
harm's way, then I'd almost say the optical disc would decay (slightly) faster
(dust particles get in the grooves (altering the defractive properties of the
medium) and the plastic cracks with old age e.t.c...)
Has anyone done any experiments to determine which decays faster?
From Martin Glanvill (mcg@waikato.ac.nz)
-----------*********======| Have a nice day |======*********-----------
########
^ #####/|#
University of Waikato 0 ####/.|#
Hamilton -|- ###/__|#
New Zealand ^ ##/ |#
_/ \_ ########
----------------****=====| A quote to make your day |======****-----------------
Captain BlackAdder: When I joined the service, we were still fighting
colonial wars; when you saw someone in a skirt, you shot him
and nicked his country.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov13.083742.12139@waikato.ac.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!mcgReferences:
<BxAJJs.ro@brunel.ac.uk> <5593@krafla.rhi.hi.is>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!mcg From: mcg@waikato.ac.nz Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.tech Subject: Decay of Optical vs Magnetic (re: Rem mass storage) Message-ID: <1992Nov13.083742.12139@waikato.ac.nz> Date: 13 Nov 92 08:37:42 +1300 References: <BxAJJs.ro@brunel.ac.uk> <5593@krafla.rhi.hi.is> Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand Lines: 34