Re: 'volatile' in Norcroft/Acorn C

Article View: comp.sys.acorn.tech

Article #446

Back to comp.sys.acorn.tech Previous Next

#446

From: Andrew P.Mell
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:28

13 lines
953 bytes

In article <1992Sep29.160306.6352@infodev.cam.ac.uk> crj10@phx.cam.ac.uk (Clive Jones) writes:
>Hmm. I've just got my hands on a draft ANSI C standard, and it's quite
>clear, unfortunately, that an implementation is under no obligation at
>all to do this, however:
>

Talking of ANSI compliance are the format specifiers for strftime()
well defined? The format specifiers for Sun cc are totally different
to those for Acorn/Norcroft C. Its a pain when porting.

Who is right?

A

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep29.192804.19018@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!amell

References: <1992Sep29.160306.6352@infodev.cam.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.tech
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!amell
From: amell@nyx.cs.du.edu (Andrew P.Mell)
Subject: Re: 'volatile' in Norcroft/Acorn C
Message-ID: <1992Sep29.192804.19018@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
References: <1992Sep29.160306.6352@infodev.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 19:28:04 GMT
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message