Article View: comp.sys.acorn.tech
Article #698Re: TCP/IP
From: C.D.Latham
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:47
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:47
46 lines
2910 bytes
2910 bytes
In article <ARM200-921214130212-4DA1D7C*@MHS> /G=Owen/S=Smith/O=SJ-Research/ADMD=INTERSPAN/C=GB/@mhs-relay.ac.uk writes: [ ... about TCP/IP software problems ... ] Yes, you are partly right there Owen in that there are several patched versions on the internet module and the original unpatched one all with the same number 1.01! Finding the right one to go with a given combination of ethernet board, nfs and vt220 is a time consuming business as I found out the other day helping a colleague. Added to that the Acorn ethernet III boards are almost, but not quite identical to the Atomwide ones. We got it going in the end by trying every possible permutation but were not helped by a very nasty interaction with RISC OS 3.1 and !Protracker which I wrote about the other day. Everything fails with internal errors and its impossible to mark the ethernet interface `up' afterwards. Only a delete-power-on reset will fix it - anything less severe results in more internal errors. There are still quite a few TCP/IP bugs and bits of bad design which I have moaned [directly] to Acorn about for the last year. Here's one for starters:- Run !VT220 and !NFSFiler. Open a telnet connection with !VT220 and login somewhere. Now mount a directory with !NFSFiler and notice that the cursor vanishes in the vt220 window with no obvious way of getting it back. Clicking on the window gives it the input focus but no cursor. Now if you think that is odd, select something in the window, click menu and observe that option Select->Type is greyed out and inoperative! Click select to clear the selection and the cursor magically returns. Now everything works as it should. The TCP/IP manuals are rather weak in some places; for example setting up the NFS printer doesn't have the vital instruction that you must export directory /var/spool/pcnfs to your Acorn machines. Ftp is implemented very poorly - a filer style interface would be best or at least the option of command line operation instead of those messy menus. The menu doesn't stay up with click adjust sometimes when it ought to which makes it even worse. I could go on but won't bore you with the other niggles. The TCP/IP software is nearly very good but just misses the mark somehow. It certainly isn't one of Acorn's best efforts which are usually excellent in my opinion. --Christopher.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzGryI.74s@cen.ex.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!strath-cs!cen.ex.ac.uk!CDLathamReferences:
<ARM200-921214130212-4DA1D7C*@MHS>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!strath-cs!cen.ex.ac.uk!CDLatham From: CDLatham@cen.ex.ac.uk (C.D.Latham) Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.tech Subject: Re: TCP/IP Message-ID: <BzGryI.74s@cen.ex.ac.uk> Date: 18 Dec 92 16:47:05 GMT References: <ARM200-921214130212-4DA1D7C*@MHS> Sender: CDLatham@cen.ex.ac.uk Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK Lines: 46 In-Reply-To: /G=Owen/S=Smith/O=SJ-Research/ADMD=INTERSPAN/C=GB/@mhs-relay.ac.uk's message of 14 Dec 92 13:02:12 GMT