🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <memo.845760@cix.compulink.co.uk>, pmoore@cix.compulink.co.uk 
(Paul Moore) writes:
> The following code, when compiled, generates a stack backtrace,
> and the program exits with status zero. How do I get the program
> to continue to the "return 0"? (Note: I KNOW ignoring FP errors
> is not good in the general case - in this case, and in the "real"
> case where this is a problem for me, the naff value in d is never
> used, and so is harmless.)

	[ Program deleted to overcome a stupid limitation of this silly news
	  reader where you have to write more lines than you quote!]

The way I would overcome this problem is to change the FPU status/control
register to prevent what ever type of FP errors you wish to ignore.  The only
problem with this is that you would have to remember these registers and
restore them when you exit your program or if it is running under the wimp,
every time you call wimp_poll.

Rob.