Thread View: comp.sys.acorn.tech
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by George Taylor
Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:47
A5000 serial port
Author: George Taylor
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:47
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:47
15 lines
1137 bytes
1137 bytes
Further to my previous posting concerning my record of faulty serial ports, I now have my machine back and working. The engineer at Norwhich Computer Services reports that the serial driver chip had suffered static damage (the driver chip is a CMOS device which uses a charge pump to create the +/- RS232 voltages). He suggests extreme care be taken with the port and that screened (hence earthing from one machine's chasis to another) leads and plugs should always be used. I would have thought that given the typical nature of serial port use (noisy environments etc) that CMOS drivers are a bad idea, I intend to make up my own buffer to protect my port. I have never heard of this problem occuring on other euqipment using serial ports. -- George
Re: A5000 serial port
Author: Richard Porter
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:29
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:29
13 lines
1232 bytes
1232 bytes
In article <C1Ewyx.2ny@dcs.ed.ac.uk> gst@dcs.ed.ac.uk (George Taylor) writes: >The engineer at Norwhich Computer Services ... >suggests extreme care be taken with the port and that screened (hence earthing >from one machine's chasis to another) leads and plugs should always be used. Screened leads, yes, but the screen should be connected at one end only and not used to provide an earth connection to either machine. This is because (a) it can cause an earth loop if both machines are earthed and (b) the chassis of the two machines may not be at the same potential particularly if they are remote. This is why there is a separate signal ground connection which is effectively a common return path for the other signals. Richard
Re: A5000 serial port
Author: Hugo Fiennes
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:25
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:25
37 lines
2520 bytes
2520 bytes
In article <C1Ewyx.2ny@dcs.ed.ac.uk> gst@dcs.ed.ac.uk writes:
>Further to my previous posting concerning my record of faulty serial ports, I
> now
>have my machine back and working.
>
>The engineer at Norwhich Computer Services reports
>that the serial driver chip had suffered static damage (the driver chip is a
> CMOS
>device which uses a charge pump to create the +/- RS232 voltages).
>He suggests extreme care be taken with the port and that screened (hence
> earthing
>from one machine's chasis to another) leads and plugs should always be used.
>I would have thought that given the typical nature of serial port use (noisy
>environments etc) that CMOS drivers are a bad idea, I intend to make up my own
>buffer to protect my port. I have never heard of this problem occuring on
>other euqipment using serial ports.
Generally on serial hardware you're not supposed to connect PG (pin 1 on
25-way) to the PG on the other end (or so I was told). As the 9-pin has
no PG, I don't know what you really should do.
A3000 serial ports never seem to blow when they've been working before...
however, I know of *many* people who have got the chips and had them D.O.A.
The old A5000's use the same method (ie charge pumps), as does our serial
card (socketed AD238's). I note with interest that the A3010/4000 use the
(very) tried and tested 1488/1489 combination with unregulated +/-12v
supply (nice you you've got it). Bombproof, practically, the way it used
to be done in 'the good old days'.
Hugo
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Did I say that? My lips didn't move..."
Hugo Fiennes - The Serial Port altman@cryton.demon.co.uk
or altman@cix.compulink.co.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads