🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Article #1128

Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?

#1128
From: Robin Hood
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 15:01
24 lines
1134 bytes
Hi,  Anyone using CD32+ A1200 setup ?

I understand A1200 can use CD32 as a slave drive to
fetch files from CD. If a program on the CD 
is  executed from A1200, is it run on CD32, or A1200, or on both ?
Can propgram address all the ram on both CD32 and A1200 ?


SX32 is indeed a very neat add-on for CD32, 
but for the cost of a Bare SX32, you can get both  CD32 and  a A1200 
(USED) that has buit-in FDD and keyboard, and more expansion potential.
than SX32. the only drawback of the later set-up is that the 2Mb CD32 chip ram
may not be shared by the whole system, but A1200 has 2 Mb instead.

My only complaint for SX32 is it is too expensive.
hope the price will be more reasonable soon. as far as
profit of a product is concerned, do not forget

$100 x 1000 >> $200 x 100 
 



 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!daresbury!usenet

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!daresbury!usenet
From: Robin Hood <bx@dl.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Subject: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?
Date: 11 Apr 1996 15:01:19 GMT
Organization: Daresbury Lab, Warrington, U.K.
Message-ID: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tcsg2.dl.ac.uk