Article View: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Article #1128Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?
From: Robin Hood
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 15:01
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 15:01
24 lines
1134 bytes
1134 bytes
Hi, Anyone using CD32+ A1200 setup ? I understand A1200 can use CD32 as a slave drive to fetch files from CD. If a program on the CD is executed from A1200, is it run on CD32, or A1200, or on both ? Can propgram address all the ram on both CD32 and A1200 ? SX32 is indeed a very neat add-on for CD32, but for the cost of a Bare SX32, you can get both CD32 and a A1200 (USED) that has buit-in FDD and keyboard, and more expansion potential. than SX32. the only drawback of the later set-up is that the 2Mb CD32 chip ram may not be shared by the whole system, but A1200 has 2 Mb instead. My only complaint for SX32 is it is too expensive. hope the price will be more reasonable soon. as far as profit of a product is concerned, do not forget $100 x 1000 >> $200 x 100
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!daresbury!usenetShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!daresbury!usenet From: Robin Hood <bx@dl.ac.uk> Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.cd32 Subject: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ? Date: 11 Apr 1996 15:01:19 GMT Organization: Daresbury Lab, Warrington, U.K. Message-ID: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: tcsg2.dl.ac.uk