Article View: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Article #1156Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?
From: Robin Hood
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 14:35
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 14:35
93 lines
4055 bytes
4055 bytes
Digital Arts Software <DigitalA@zenecaen.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > In article: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> Robin Hood <bx@dl.ac.uk> writes: > > > > Hi, Anyone using CD32+ A1200 setup ? > > > > I understand A1200 can use CD32 as a slave drive to > > fetch files from CD. If a program on the CD > > is executed from A1200, is it run on CD32, or A1200, or on both ? > > Can propgram address all the ram on both CD32 and A1200 ? > > > > > > SX32 is indeed a very neat add-on for CD32, > > but for the cost of a Bare SX32, you can get both CD32 and a A1200 > > (USED) that has buit-in FDD and keyboard, and more expansion potential. > > than SX32. the only drawback of the later set-up is that the 2Mb CD32 chip ram > > may not be shared by the whole system, but A1200 has 2 Mb instead. > > > > My only complaint for SX32 is it is too expensive. > > hope the price will be more reasonable soon. as far as > > profit of a product is concerned, do not forget > > > > $100 x 1000 >> $200 x 100 > > > > You can currently purchase a CD32 for around 130-200 from > most mail order companies in the UK. Less than 70 quid on second-hand market. > > Add this to the Total price of an SX1 or SX32 > > SX32 - 240 Inc A1000 Compact Keyboard > SX1 - 220 Inc PC Style Keyboard > > Ext Floppy from 20-80 DD & HD > That will end up around 300 quid. > A NEW A1200 costs 399.99 from Amiga Technologies. > and you need a CDROM DRIVE on top of this to access > CDs... > I do not think there will be many people in UK pay 400 quid for a bare A1200. On second-hand market, you can get a CD32 in less than 70 pound and bare A1200 in less than 150 pound. a new Network CD kit for 30 pound. which will end up around 250 quid. The advantage is that A1200 has the built-in Keyboard and FDD, and the potential for accellerator add-on. and you will have two AGA machine. > When connecting a CD32 to any other Amiga, file transfer > is really slow. an SX1 or SX32 setup give instant CD access! > That is the main advantage of SX32, but you will be stuck in EC020 forever. > I have used the CD32 NetworkCDs 1&2 and when they crash its > a real pain up the backside, having to reboot both machines > and start again.... Can you down load the files to the HDD on the A1200 before run it ? > > Its upto you, but in our office we have 3 SX1+CD32s with > 4-8Mb and 80-200Mb Harddisks and they work great. We even > have on of the CD32+SX1 connected to the Internet via > a 14.4 modem and Ibrowse and THOR.. it works great, better > than some scummy PeeCEE + Netscape setup. > > Darren Evans > Amiga Project Manager > > _ ____ ___ ______ _______ _ > d# ####b g#00 `N##0" _agN#0P0N# d# > d## jN## j##F J## _dN0" " d## > .#]## _P ##L jN##F ### g#0" .#]## > dE_j## # 0## jF ##F j##F j##' ______ dE_j## > .0"""N## d" ##L0 ##F 0## 0## "9##F" .0"""5## > .dF' ]## jF ##0 ##F ##F `##k d## .dF' j## > .g#_ _j##___g#__ ]N _j##L_ _d##L_ `#Nh___g#N' .g#_ _j##__ > """"" """"""""""" " """""" """""" """"""" """"" """""" > +----------------------- Back for the future -----------------------+ > Digital Arts Public Domain Software > < http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/digiarts > > < E-Mail: Darren@zenecaen.demon.co.uk >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4l2vk7$saa@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!daresbury!usenetReferences:
<4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> <75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!daresbury!usenet From: Robin Hood <bx@dl.ac.uk> Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.cd32 Subject: Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ? Date: 17 Apr 1996 14:35:51 GMT Organization: Daresbury Lab, Warrington, U.K. Message-ID: <4l2vk7$saa@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> <75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: tcsg2.dl.ac.uk