Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.cd32

Article #1171

Back to comp.sys.amiga.cd32 Previous Next

#1171

From: Paul Dossett
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 11:50

19 lines
1191 bytes

Robin Hood (bx@dl.ac.uk) said:

>> When connecting a CD32 to any other Amiga, file transfer
>> is really slow. an SX1 or SX32 setup give instant CD access!
>>

>That is the main advantage of SX32, but you will be stuck in EC020
>forever.

Not in a couple of months.  It *will* be acceleratible.. (new word?)


--
Paul Dossett | EpiphoneYamahaPearlPaiste | Amiga 2000/040/17/365/ZIP/3.1__
-------------| Amiga owner since 1988!   | Amiga CD32/020/10/200/3.1 __///
Melbourne OZ | astroboy@netspace.net.au  | 1976 Toyota Corolla 1.2   \XX/
             | ObWebSite : http://netspace.net.au/~astroboy/

Disclaimer:  The real Paul is out to lunch; this is an automated response.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <674.6684T916T1059@netspace.net.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.netspace.net.au!usenet

References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> <75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk> <4l2vk7$saa@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.netspace.net.au!usenet
From: astroboy@netspace.net.au (Paul Dossett)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Subject: Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?
Date: 20 Apr 1996 11:50:58 GMT
Organization: NetSpace Online Systems
Message-ID: <674.6684T916T1059@netspace.net.au>
References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> <75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk> <4l2vk7$saa@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-a2-26.mel.netspace.net.au
X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)

Reply to Parent Message