🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Article #11340

Re: A Real Amiga Emulator

#11340
From: Patrick Hanevold
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 04:19
58 lines
3090 bytes
>How can you even think that you can compare a top-line amiga
>(A4000/060 + gfx board + 32Mb) to a PC in the same price-range ???
>(PPro/200 + VRam4Mb gfx + 32Mb)

I didnt. :) The tread was about UAE on a pentium.

>A P133 is several (200 or more) times faster then a A500 (68000/7Mhz)
>_ALL_ Graphics cards for the pc have blitters built in, most sound cards are
>just crushing the amiga sound chips. (32-channel 16-bit 44Khz mixing ?)
>
>If you want to say "PC's are not that good in emulating amiga's" you're 100%
>right, but "A Pentium does not get close to a real Amiga" is ofcourse
>bullshit.
>(Pentium is a CPU, and i assume you meant to compare Amiga's with
>Pentium-based PC's)

Nope. A Pentium runing UAE with a Amiga. :)

>But fact is that PC's are gaining more and more on amiga's. (Hell, even
>lightwave was ported to the pc.) And it's a matter of time that PC's -will-
>be able to emulate amiga.
Todays "dead" Amigas, sure. But by then the Power Amiga's should be out.

>(UAE on a Pentium Pro / 250Mhz, wich makes use of GUS and GFX-card extensions
>must be enough to emulate a A1200) It's time you amiga dudes realize that.
A *STOCK* A1200 *MABY*, but sure as hell not *AN* *REAL* Amiga.

>But hey, most modern amiga's are capable of -emulating- an XT, or even a
>80386 at reasonable speed. It's only logical that todays hardware can emulate
>other hardware from the past. (Both amiga -> pc and pc -> amiga) But it's
>essential to the amiga that AT will prevent the competition (Apple, Pc's,
>whatever.) that they will emulate modern amiga's.

>This is not a flame or something, it's not even a pc-commercial. I've had a
>Amiga since the release of KS1.2 (Good ol' A500)  and a A1200 and
>A4000/40/20Mb after that. I  programmed every bit of it, and it was
>wonderful. I sold both last year to get myself  a P133/32Mb. (No regrets
>yet.)

>Fact is: -PC operating systems suck.
Agreed. Only usefull OS must be Linux i think.

>         -Amiga hardware sucks and amiga OS lacks things (But works great).
Agreed.

>It's a matter of opinion, and i chose for the speed. It's a free world. Chose
>for  yourself.

OK. I choose a BeBox. :)

Whops. That random tag now? That must mean something. :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
..    Patrick Hanevold - VR developer - patrick.hanevold@login.eunet.no   ///
....  Amiga and official Be developer - Visual Technologies           \\\///
......     I'll rather die than use a MS-DOS/Windows based machine.    \X//
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2594.6684T369T2078@login.eunet.no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!Norway.EU.net!usenet
References: <899.6672T874T560@login.eunet.no> <4kvurb$ofu@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!Norway.EU.net!usenet
From: patrick.hanevold@login.eunet.no (Patrick Hanevold)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: A Real Amiga Emulator
Date: 20 Apr 1996 04:19:41 GMT
Organization: EUnet Norway
Message-ID: <2594.6684T369T2078@login.eunet.no>
References: <899.6672T874T560@login.eunet.no> <4kvurb$ofu@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc5.asker-pm2-1.eunet.no
X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)