Article View: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Article #11340Re: A Real Amiga Emulator
From: Patrick Hanevold
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 04:19
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 04:19
58 lines
3090 bytes
3090 bytes
>How can you even think that you can compare a top-line amiga >(A4000/060 + gfx board + 32Mb) to a PC in the same price-range ??? >(PPro/200 + VRam4Mb gfx + 32Mb) I didnt. :) The tread was about UAE on a pentium. >A P133 is several (200 or more) times faster then a A500 (68000/7Mhz) >_ALL_ Graphics cards for the pc have blitters built in, most sound cards are >just crushing the amiga sound chips. (32-channel 16-bit 44Khz mixing ?) > >If you want to say "PC's are not that good in emulating amiga's" you're 100% >right, but "A Pentium does not get close to a real Amiga" is ofcourse >bullshit. >(Pentium is a CPU, and i assume you meant to compare Amiga's with >Pentium-based PC's) Nope. A Pentium runing UAE with a Amiga. :) >But fact is that PC's are gaining more and more on amiga's. (Hell, even >lightwave was ported to the pc.) And it's a matter of time that PC's -will- >be able to emulate amiga. Todays "dead" Amigas, sure. But by then the Power Amiga's should be out. >(UAE on a Pentium Pro / 250Mhz, wich makes use of GUS and GFX-card extensions >must be enough to emulate a A1200) It's time you amiga dudes realize that. A *STOCK* A1200 *MABY*, but sure as hell not *AN* *REAL* Amiga. >But hey, most modern amiga's are capable of -emulating- an XT, or even a >80386 at reasonable speed. It's only logical that todays hardware can emulate >other hardware from the past. (Both amiga -> pc and pc -> amiga) But it's >essential to the amiga that AT will prevent the competition (Apple, Pc's, >whatever.) that they will emulate modern amiga's. >This is not a flame or something, it's not even a pc-commercial. I've had a >Amiga since the release of KS1.2 (Good ol' A500) and a A1200 and >A4000/40/20Mb after that. I programmed every bit of it, and it was >wonderful. I sold both last year to get myself a P133/32Mb. (No regrets >yet.) >Fact is: -PC operating systems suck. Agreed. Only usefull OS must be Linux i think. > -Amiga hardware sucks and amiga OS lacks things (But works great). Agreed. >It's a matter of opinion, and i chose for the speed. It's a free world. Chose >for yourself. OK. I choose a BeBox. :) Whops. That random tag now? That must mean something. :) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- .. Patrick Hanevold - VR developer - patrick.hanevold@login.eunet.no /// .... Amiga and official Be developer - Visual Technologies \\\/// ...... I'll rather die than use a MS-DOS/Windows based machine. \X// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2594.6684T369T2078@login.eunet.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!Norway.EU.net!usenetReferences:
<899.6672T874T560@login.eunet.no> <4kvurb$ofu@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!Norway.EU.net!usenet From: patrick.hanevold@login.eunet.no (Patrick Hanevold) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations Subject: Re: A Real Amiga Emulator Date: 20 Apr 1996 04:19:41 GMT Organization: EUnet Norway Message-ID: <2594.6684T369T2078@login.eunet.no> References: <899.6672T874T560@login.eunet.no> <4kvurb$ofu@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: pc5.asker-pm2-1.eunet.no X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)