🚀 go-pugleaf

 niels%rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de@INTERNET wrote : 

>
> Steffen Haeuser (magicsn@birdland.es.bawue.de) wrote:
>
>> Wrong. [...] Still wrong. [...] Wrong.
>
> C'mon, take it easy. You missed the main point. I didn't say a Cybervision
> couldn't speed things up compared to AGA, I just mentioned that a graphics
> board, compared with another graphics board, will naturally speed up those
> things it actually does itself, but not the many others on the same scale.

Oops... did my mail really look that "wrong... wrong..." if one removed every 
content of it ? ;)

>
> In those other areas all Zorro-II boards are more or less alike, as well
> as, on a somewhat higher level, all Zorro-III boards.
>
> BTW didn't you tell me you would send me some library and benchmark program
> to check on my A3000T/040 w/ SD64? I haven't received anything yet.

Oh, well... sorry, forgot about it (but in the meanwhile it should be on 
Aminet, try docs/misc/tmap.lha, contains (asides from the Amiga Texturemapping 
FAQ and another text document a preview version of rtgmaster.library together 
with a short demo for speed checking...)

Steffen Haeuser