Article View: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Article #8784Re: Why are europeans dumb enough to buy amigas?
From: kjgudim Kjell Gudim
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 22:29
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 22:29
162 lines
7152 bytes
7152 bytes
Mr. Pink wrote this in comp.sys.amiga.graphics: >> A little while ago my father bought a Pentium 60 and was told that this >> was an awesome machine... Now the machine is about as awesome as my 6 speed >> bike >> :) >> >Heh! Precisely. This can be linked to the Amiga (hello mr Amiga hating type >person >;).... How many models of PC came and went in the lifetime of the 500 (which >we happen to have two of which at home, aswell as my 4k....) Quite a number... :) I'm actually sorry that I sold my old 500. But I still have my C64! :) >As for the argument of the Amiga being a heap of @#*^, especially when it >comes to DOOM clones etc etc, lets just ask ourselves a few questions. >Where did other games classics such as Lemmings, Populous etc Originate? Hm... Gee, I give up... :) >The amiga wasn't it? >Well **** me sideways, so it was... Oh yeah! That's right! Remarkable isn't it? >and the PC >conversions just couldnt do the gfx and sfx justice even then. (We won't >mention the megadrive versions >- wot no mouse????!!! ;) :) >On a more serious level, lets go back a few years (bizarre Waynes world >swirly effect thing....) xtreeeeme close up!!! >my 386 include a SoundCard / Chip? PCS: No, Sorry. Me: The Amigas custom >architecture does, doesn't it? PCS: Yes. >(well, you get the idea....) >Now, in that little 'conversation', I mentioned that dirty word to PC owners >- multitasking. Could I just take this opportunity to congratulate them on >the arrival of Win 95. (Ignoring OS2 - it just doesnt seem to have been given >the support it deserved)...... How could it? The lord and emperor Gates didn't support it :) >"Windows 95 will make it possible for you to do what you do faster, and more >fun" It says (or something like it) at the start of the installation. More >fun? Please! .... Can you imagine sitting at work with your boss behind you >as you explain the Pros of Win 95 - "its plug and play, making things more >fun, and games are quicker too...." He's sure to be impressed. Anyway, back >to the point. :) >Windows 95 multitasks. Sort of. It timeslices in much the same way as the >Amiga has for the past 8 years or so. *When* you run 32 bit programs... >Win 95 system requirements: at least a 486sx 33 (?) (DX2 66+ recommended), >with 4mb ram >(8mb+ recommended), and 50mbHD space (?). I've run Win95 on 486 DX 33 with 8 Mb RAM... It was hell on earth! >Amiga workbench requirements: An amiga. Yepp. Amiga 1200, 2 Mb RAM, 80 Mb HD. >So, you buy your 486sx33 4mb PC for about the same price as an A1200. Your >A1200 is all set to go, Everything is on its (admittedly small) HD. Your PC >sits their waiting for you to go out and buy Win 95. Another 80 quid or so. >Yay, we are multitasking. Not as quickly as the A1200 tho. Oh well, lets buy >some more RAM. Apparently that makes it faster. Cool, another 100 quid spent. >Things have improved, but not by much. Lets see what we can do. A new >processsor you say? Ooooh, lets go pentium. P60 good enough? yeah! ....... Oh dear. Have we spent a little sum of dosh, eh? >Oh the subject of Win 95, a couple of points. Plug and Play. HAven't amigas >had basically the same thing for years? Sence the arrivel of Zorro we have had full Plug and Play. And the Plug and Play on the PC's are more of a Plug and Pray if you ask me :) >Take the example: >I put a second HD in my machine. Plug in, switch on. Machine sits there. For >a whole 5 seconds. Boots, and I go to partition the new drive, at which point >it tells me 'drives have been added / removed from the system' etc. Ok, so it >wasnt sure if something had been added or removed. Win 95's plug and play >requires that you specifically specify the new device, or let it spend 20 >mins or so looking for it (which a m8 of mine did.... it couldnt find his new >HD......) :) Cool. As I said above... >working my ass off' Does it amuse you at all that while it is booting, it is >totally free to work, until anything useful like the start button appears, at >which point it switches to totally busy? :) Well, when I used it it was almost busy all the time.. :) >I think by now my point is clear. The PC is a better machine than the Amiga. >I have no doubt about it, despite being proud of my A4K 030. Its just a shame >that PC owners a) refuse to admit that what 95 does, the Amiga has done for >years, a whole lot better, at a fraction of the requirements / cost. b) Ok >DOOM was, and still is bloody brilliant (despite me being crap at it!). Part >of DOOM's success was it being released as PD. People love saving money dont >ya know. Yes. The PC(The machine you sit and watch) is good enough. *BUT* ,the operatingsystem stinks! No questions asked. But kind of heaven is a PC(or RISC) machine with a highly developed Workbench 4.0 running it. ahhh..... >prepared to fork out several hundred pounds for a single database. For >several hundred pounds Amiga owners get no end of packages. Ok, they arent as >good, but they do their job. Very few Amiga titles cost over 100 pounds. Very >few PC titles cost less than 100 pounds! (Not talking games here) :) Just take Wordworth as an example. It cost $100 and is in my opinion just as good or better than word. I haven't got the exact price on Word, *but* I do believe that it costs a *little* more than $100... :) >The Amiga CD ROM scene is still quite new. Their is no argument to be made >here - we will just have to see if it gets the support it deserves / needs. >All I'll say on that little matter is that on the off chance that there is >some rep of an Amiga softy house out there - remember, its not just CD32 >owners that can play games on CD now... Right. Maybe we should set the minimummachine on all games to the following : A4000/040 10 Mb RAM CDROM 2x gfx card (2 Mb or more) sfx card (16 bit) I wonder what kind of games would apear then... :) >There. On that note, I'll finish, before I stray from the point even more. >But Kjell Gudim is right. PC technology moves on sooooo fast. Thank you :) >My M8s P60 is out of date now too - before the warranty has even expired! But >my A4000/030>is still keeping up, despite being almost 3 years old. Yep! So does mine and I'll keep it a few more years, thank you. -- ------------------------- -------------------------- | Kjell Gudim | EMail : kjgudim@sn.no | Using Thor v2.22 #1137 | | LoungeBar Development | IRC : Kjellvis | "Make bits not war!" | ------------------------- --------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6557.6652T1157T2026@Th0r.foo.bar>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sn.no!not-for-mailReferences:
<1996Mar11.221045@cantva> <1233.6645T1144T27@Th0r.foo.bar> <314D4DFB.2524@aber.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sn.no!not-for-mail From: kjgudim (Kjell Gudim) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics Subject: Re: Why are europeans dumb enough to buy amigas? Date: 20 Mar 1996 23:29:36 +0100 Organization: SN Internett Message-ID: <6557.6652T1157T2026@Th0r.foo.bar> References: <1996Mar11.221045@cantva> <1233.6645T1144T27@Th0r.foo.bar> <314D4DFB.2524@aber.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: sinsen.sn.no X-Newsreader: THOR 2.21 (Amiga;SOUP)