Article View: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Article #8993Re: Should html gfx all be laced?
From: Victor Vargas G.
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 08:15
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 08:15
17 lines
1080 bytes
1080 bytes
In article <4jjuvd$spg@news.aloha.com>, lo@kokee.hawaiian.net (Lopaka) wrote: > Should inline images all be laced? What about backgrounds? Interlace usually helps big graphics to appear to 'wipe-in' blinds-like, so the user has an idea of what the incoming graphic is during slow transfers. However, Netscape 2.x onwards displays incoming grafx as fat, big pixels, gradually refining... > Should I use gif89a even if transparency is not needed? Haven't seen a notable difference in filesize between 87 and 89a files, so if you really don't need transparency and don't have access to gif89a tools, it's a safe bet to use plain gif (as in ADPro/ImageFX)... -- Victor Vargas G. Amiga 3D animation & video graphics/Mac DTP
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<fulldog-0104960212370001@167.114.251.9>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.sfasu.edu!NewsWatcher!userReferences:
<4jjuvd$spg@news.aloha.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.sfasu.edu!NewsWatcher!user From: fulldog@tag01.acnet.net (Victor Vargas G.) Subject: Re: Should html gfx all be laced? Message-ID: <fulldog-0104960212370001@167.114.251.9> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 08:15:06 GMT References: <4jjuvd$spg@news.aloha.com> Organization: NoneYet :^\